Jan Feld

610 total citations · 1 hit paper
23 papers, 313 citations indexed

About

Jan Feld is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Jan Feld has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 313 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Education, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Jan Feld's work include Innovations in Educational Methods (8 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (6 papers) and School Choice and Performance (6 papers). Jan Feld is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Educational Methods (8 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (6 papers) and School Choice and Performance (6 papers). Jan Feld collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Germany and Australia. Jan Feld's co-authors include Ulf Zölitz, Nicolás Salamanca, Daniel S. Hamermesh, Andries de Grip, Jan Sauermann, Eberhard Feess, Shakked Noy, Andreas Leibbrandt, Joe Vecci and Julia M. Rohrer and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, The Economic Journal and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Jan Feld

21 papers receiving 294 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Understanding Peer Effects: On the Nature, Estimation, and Channels of Peer Effects

2016 162 citations Jan Feld, Ulf Zölitz Journal of Labor Economics profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jan Feld New Zealand	7	191	97	64	53	31	23	313
Gerald Eisenkopf Germany	9	105 0.5×	81 0.8×	120 1.9×	67 1.3×	23 0.7×	31	295
Andrea Velásquez Ecuador	9	119 0.6×	101 1.0×	19 0.3×	35 0.7×	13 0.4×	31	290
Uulkje de Jong Netherlands	9	224 1.2×	102 1.1×	20 0.3×	36 0.7×	13 0.4×	29	339
Sebastian Fehrler Germany	8	40 0.2×	122 1.3×	157 2.5×	66 1.2×	9 0.3×	25	310
Hans Bonesrønning Norway	12	356 1.9×	74 0.8×	30 0.5×	66 1.2×	20 0.6×	24	433
Neal H. Olitsky United States	8	214 1.1×	33 0.3×	37 0.6×	18 0.3×	8 0.3×	11	281
Martin Humburg Netherlands	6	120 0.6×	44 0.5×	18 0.3×	56 1.1×	13 0.4×	15	242
Alejandro Ganimian United States	10	327 1.7×	49 0.5×	140 2.2×	35 0.7×	22 0.7×	34	456
Zeyu Xu United States	10	441 2.3×	66 0.7×	39 0.6×	37 0.7×	10 0.3×	32	524
Rowena Blokker Netherlands	3	163 0.9×	41 0.4×	66 1.0×	23 0.4×	17 0.5×	5	269

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Feld

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Feld's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Feld with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Feld more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Feld

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Feld. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Feld. The network helps show where Jan Feld may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Feld

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Feld. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Feld based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Feld. Jan Feld is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Feld, Jan, et al.. (2024). Re‐examining the relationship between patience, risk‐taking, and human capital investment across countries*. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 39(4). 705–713. 1 indexed citations

2.

Feld, Jan, et al.. (2023). Writing matters. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 217. 378–397. 2 indexed citations

3.

Feld, Jan, et al.. (2022). No Evidence That Siblings’ Gender Affects Personality Across Nine Countries. Psychological Science. 33(9). 1574–1587. 3 indexed citations

4.

Feld, Jan, et al.. (2022). Identifying and Overcoming Gender Barriers in Tech: A Field Experiment on Inaccurate Statistical Discrimination. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations

5.

Feld, Jan & Ulf Zölitz. (2022). The effect of higher-achieving peers on major choices and labor market outcomes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 196. 200–219. 6 indexed citations

6.

Feess, Eberhard, Jan Feld, & Shakked Noy. (2021). People Judge Discrimination Against Women More Harshly Than Discrimination Against Men – Does Statistical Fairness Discrimination Explain Why?. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 675776–675776. 5 indexed citations

7.

Feld, Jan & Ulf Zölitz. (2021). The Effect of Higher-Achieving Peers on Major Choices and Labor Market Outcomes. SSRN Electronic Journal.

8.

Feld, Jan, Nicolás Salamanca, & Ulf Zölitz. (2019). Students are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

9.

Feld, Jan, Nicolás Salamanca, & Ulf Zölitz. (2019). Students are almost as effective as professors in university teaching. Economics of Education Review. 73. 101912–101912. 3 indexed citations

10.

Feld, Jan & Ulf Zölitz. (2018). Peers from Venus and Mars – higher-achieving men foster gender gaps in major choice and labor market outcomes. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 4 indexed citations

11.

Feld, Jan, Nicolás Salamanca, & Ulf Zölitz. (2018). Are Professors Worth it? The Value-Added and Costs of Tutorial Instructors. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

12.

Feld, Jan, Nicolás Salamanca, & Ulf Zölitz. (2018). Are Professors Worth It?. The Journal of Human Resources. 55(3). 836–863. 17 indexed citations

13.

Feld, Jan, et al.. (2018). Do People Pay More Attention to Earthquakes in Western Countries?. RiuNet (Politechnical University of Valencia). 1 indexed citations

14.

Zölitz, Ulf & Jan Feld. (2018). The effect of peer gender on major choice. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 10 indexed citations

15.

Feld, Jan, Nicolás Salamanca, & Ulf Zölitz. (2017). Students Are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

16.

Zölitz, Ulf & Jan Feld. (2017). The Effect of Peer Gender on Major Choice. SSRN Electronic Journal. 9 indexed citations

17.

Feld, Jan, Jan Sauermann, & Andries de Grip. (2017). Estimating the relationship between skill and overconfidence. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 68. 18–24. 34 indexed citations

18.

Feld, Jan, et al.. (2017). Estimating the Relationship between Skill and Overconfidence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

19.

Feld, Jan & Ulf Zölitz. (2016). Understanding Peer Effects: On the Nature, Estimation, and Channels of Peer Effects. Journal of Labor Economics. 35(2). 387–428. 162 indexed citations breakdown →

20.

Salamanca, Nicolás & Jan Feld. (2016). A Short Note on Discrimination and Favoritism in the Labor Market. The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics. 17(1). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact