Giovanni De Grandis

1.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
14 papers, 642 citations indexed

About

Giovanni De Grandis is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Giovanni De Grandis has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 642 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 2 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Giovanni De Grandis's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers). Giovanni De Grandis is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers). Giovanni De Grandis collaborates with scholars based in Norway, United Kingdom and United States. Giovanni De Grandis's co-authors include David Osrin, Ian Ridley, Myfanwy Taylor, Julio D. Dávila, Pedro Curi Hallal, Philippa Howden‐Chapman, Juliana Martins, Ian Scott, Paul Wilkinson and Yvonne Rydin and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, The Science of The Total Environment and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Giovanni De Grandis

13 papers receiving 614 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Shaping cities for health: complexity and the planning of urban environments in the 21st century

2012 534 citations Yvonne Rydin, Michael Davies et al. The Lancet profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Giovanni De Grandis Norway	5	270	144	124	91	84	14	642
Juliana Martins United Kingdom	3	245 0.9×	147 1.0×	124 1.0×	86 0.9×	84 1.0×	5	569
Myfanwy Taylor United Kingdom	6	243 0.9×	152 1.1×	126 1.0×	100 1.1×	84 1.0×	15	654
Iain Butterworth Australia	6	172 0.6×	243 1.7×	130 1.0×	75 0.8×	29 0.3×	27	537
Meelan Thondoo United Kingdom	13	353 1.3×	109 0.8×	38 0.3×	107 1.2×	188 2.2×	25	766
Helen Pineo United Kingdom	12	155 0.6×	90 0.6×	127 1.0×	116 1.3×	26 0.3×	26	437
Carl Higgs Australia	11	168 0.6×	314 2.2×	119 1.0×	41 0.5×	18 0.2×	34	556
Ricky Burdett United Kingdom	7	109 0.4×	170 1.2×	56 0.5×	44 0.5×	22 0.3×	24	400
Andrea Rebecchi Italy	13	388 1.4×	135 0.9×	33 0.3×	63 0.7×	63 0.8×	45	794
Chenghua Guan China	12	254 0.9×	68 0.5×	27 0.2×	36 0.4×	45 0.5×	28	553
Claire Boulangé Australia	13	175 0.6×	405 2.8×	77 0.6×	37 0.4×	17 0.2×	14	568

Countries citing papers authored by Giovanni De Grandis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giovanni De Grandis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giovanni De Grandis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giovanni De Grandis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giovanni De Grandis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giovanni De Grandis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giovanni De Grandis. The network helps show where Giovanni De Grandis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Giovanni De Grandis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Giovanni De Grandis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Giovanni De Grandis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Giovanni De Grandis. Giovanni De Grandis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

Korsnes, Marius, et al.. (2025). Losing control, learning to fail: leveraging techniques from improvisational theatre for trust and collaboration in transdisciplinary research and education. QRU Quaderns de Recerca en Urbanisme. 4(1). 129–166. 1 indexed citations

Grandis, Giovanni De, et al.. (2023). When is a Techno-Fix Legitimate? The Case of Viticultural Climate Resilience. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 36(1). 4 indexed citations

Grandis, Giovanni De. (2023). ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES OF INFORMAL URBAN EXPANSION: AKURE'S INFORMAL LAND DELIVERY. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations

Grandis, Giovanni De, Irina Brass, & Suzanne S. Farid. (2022). Is regulatory innovation fit for purpose? A case study of adaptive regulation for advanced biotherapeutics. Regulation & Governance. 17(3). 810–832. 4 indexed citations

Grandis, Giovanni De. (2020). Fair trade in building digital knowledge repositories: the knowledge economy as if researchers mattered. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 23(4). 549–563. 2 indexed citations

Ghisi, Daniela, Giovanni De Grandis, Andrea Fanelli, et al.. (2020). Non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring with Clearsight in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia for total hip replacement. A prospective observational cohort study.. PubMed. 91(4). e2020182–e2020182. 2 indexed citations

Carusi, Annamaria, Mark Davies, Giovanni De Grandis, et al.. (2018). Harvesting the promise of AOPs: An assessment and recommendations. The Science of The Total Environment. 628-629. 1542–1556. 53 indexed citations

Grandis, Giovanni De. (2017). Pharmacogenomic Inequalities: Strategies for Justice in Biomedical Research and Healthcare. Diametros. 153–172. 2 indexed citations

Grandis, Giovanni De. (2017). Ethics in Technology: a Philosophical Study. NanoEthics. 12(1). 75–78. 1 indexed citations

10.

Grandis, Giovanni De, et al.. (2016). Conceptual and terminological confusion around personalised medicine: a coping strategy. BMC Medical Ethics. 17(1). 43–43. 24 indexed citations

11.

Grandis, Giovanni De. (2015). Practical integration: The art of balancing values, institutions and knowledge – lessons from the History of British Public Health and Town Planning. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 56. 92–105. 5 indexed citations

12.

Carusi, Annamaria & Giovanni De Grandis. (2012). The Ethical Work That Regulations Will Not Do. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 8 indexed citations

13.

Rydin, Yvonne, Michael Davies, Julio D. Dávila, et al.. (2012). Shaping cities for health: complexity and the planning of urban environments in the 21st century. The Lancet. 379(9831). 2079–2108. 534 indexed citations breakdown →

14.

Grandis, Giovanni De & Jasper Littmann. (2011). Pandemics - Background paper. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 109(5). 1662–1672. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact