Emily Cameron-Blake
Impact in
- Modeling and Simulation top 0.2%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Health top 2%
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Health disparities and outcomes
Papers in
- Genetics 3
- Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 2
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 1
- Forensic and Genetic Research 1
-
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 1
- Co-authors
- Anna Petherick (2 shared papers)Toby Phillips (2 shared papers)Thomas Hale (2 shared papers)Beatriz Kira (1 shared paper)Rafael Goldszmidt (1 shared paper)Noam Angrist (1 shared paper)Mark D. Shriver (4 shared papers)Esteban J. Parra (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nature Human Behaviour (2 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)Molecular Biology and Evolution (1 paper)Clinical Genetics (1 paper)Human Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emily Cameron-Blake
8 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Emily Cameron-Blake's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
- Modeling and Simulation 834
- Health 305
- Economics and Econometrics 818
- Clinical Psychology 424
- Transportation 120
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Cameron-Blake
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Cameron-Blake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Cameron-Blake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Cameron-Blake more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Cameron-Blake
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Cameron-Blake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Cameron-Blake. The network helps show where Emily Cameron-Blake may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Cameron-Blake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker) Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 2834 |
| 2 | 2006 | 119 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 98 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 1 |
About Emily Cameron-Blake
Emily Cameron-Blake is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper), Forensic and Genetic Research (1 paper) and Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (834 citations), Health (305 citations), Economics and Econometrics (818 citations), Clinical Psychology (424 citations) and Transportation (120 citations). Emily Cameron-Blake has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anna Petherick, Toby Phillips, Thomas Hale, Beatriz Kira, Rafael Goldszmidt, Noam Angrist, Mark D. Shriver, Esteban J. Parra, J Kumate and Niels H. Wacher. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Human Behaviour, Scientific Reports, Molecular Biology and Evolution, Clinical Genetics and Human Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.