Stephen John

84 total papers · 1.0k total citations
43 papers, 476 citations indexed

About

Stephen John is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen John has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 476 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in General Health Professions, 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 10 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Stephen John's work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (6 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (5 papers). Stephen John is often cited by papers focused on Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (6 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (5 papers). Stephen John collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Pakistan. Stephen John's co-authors include Angus Dawson, Juliet A. Usher‐Smith, Rebecca A. Dennison, Eli Y. Adashi, Richard Ashcroft, Angela Dawson, Anthony Kessel, Norman Daniels, Stephen Wilkinson and Ainsley J. Newson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The American Journal of Medicine and European Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Stephen John

37 papers receiving 431 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Stephen John 227 124 97 64 61 43 476
Liam Kofi Bright 199 0.9× 104 0.8× 48 0.5× 44 0.7× 110 1.8× 27 498
José Julián López 200 0.9× 31 0.3× 75 0.8× 16 0.3× 8 0.1× 27 431
Daniel J. Singer 191 0.8× 96 0.8× 13 0.1× 28 0.4× 43 0.7× 39 535
Quentin Lauer 138 0.6× 155 1.3× 27 0.3× 22 0.3× 33 0.5× 40 474
Jacob Busch 31 0.1× 22 0.2× 54 0.6× 18 0.3× 43 0.7× 30 417
Chris Kaposy 81 0.4× 38 0.3× 82 0.8× 75 1.2× 8 0.1× 41 508
Gayle Greene 119 0.5× 36 0.3× 56 0.6× 8 0.1× 5 0.1× 51 536
James C. Mohr 143 0.6× 24 0.2× 90 0.9× 9 0.1× 15 0.2× 36 545
Toby Handfield 85 0.4× 171 1.4× 19 0.2× 117 1.8× 105 1.7× 45 434
Carl Wellman 153 0.7× 134 1.1× 34 0.4× 50 0.8× 10 0.2× 45 466

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen John

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen John more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen John

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen John. The network helps show where Stephen John may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen John

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen John. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen John based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen John. Stephen John is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026