James Whyte

41 papers receiving 929 citations

Peers

James Whyte
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Research and Theory 46
  • Family Practice 74
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 441
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 26
  • Emergency Medical Services 107
Replace Kirsten Jack with:
Kirsten Jack United Kingdom
Ian Jones United Kingdom
Katherine F Shepard United States
Megan Smith Australia
Ian Edwards Australia
Berit Εika Denmark
Laurita M. Hack United States
Brett Vaughan Australia
Peter Curtis United States
James Whyte relative to Kirsten Jack United Kingdom Kirsten Jack's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Kirsten Jack · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Whyte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Whyte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Whyte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Whyte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Whyte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Whyte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Whyte. The network helps show where James Whyte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Whyte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Whyte Line = papers co-authored together James Whyte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999482
2 2007133
3 201146
4 200931
5 201224
6 201123
7 200623
8
An exploration of the relationship between knowledge and performance-related variables in high-fidelity simulation: designing instruction that promotes expertise in practice.
201022
9 199321
10 200919
11 201515
12 201014
13 201611
14 201611
15 201611
16 20129
17 20159
18 20109
19 20088
20 20047

About James Whyte

James Whyte is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Physiology, Emergency Medical Services, Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 997 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (13 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (10 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (7 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (7 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (7 papers), Nursing education and management (6 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (6 papers) and Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (46 citations), Family Practice (74 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (441 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (26 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (107 citations). James Whyte has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Walter F. Stewart, Richard B. Lipton, Joshua N. Liberman, J. Sawyer, K. Kolodner, Andrew Dowson, Paul Ward, K. Anders Ericsson, Eileen Cormier and David W. Eccles. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, Journal of Community Health Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management and Heart & Lung.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact