James T. Bennett

97 papers receiving 992 citations

Peers

James T. Bennett
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Public Administration 168
  • Economics and Econometrics 368
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 231
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 103
  • Strategy and Management 127
Replace D. C. Hague with:
D. C. Hague United States
Xiangming Chen China
Philip Wright Hong Kong
Andrew Stewart Australia
Neil Alderman United Kingdom
Yanqing Lai China
Yasuhiro Sato Japan
Joyce Liddle United Kingdom
Abdullah Gök United Kingdom
Berend van der Kolk Netherlands
James T. Bennett relative to D. C. Hague United States D. C. Hague's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
D. C. Hague · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James T. Bennett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James T. Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James T. Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James T. Bennett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James T. Bennett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James T. Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James T. Bennett. The network helps show where James T. Bennett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James T. Bennett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James T. Bennett Line = papers co-authored together James T. Bennett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015114
2 198266
3 201859
4 197958
5 198045
6 197441
7 201339
8 201432
9 201231
10 198029
11 201229
12 201227
13 200326
14 199124
15 197523
16 200122
17 199321
18 198321
19 200321
20 198119

About James T. Bennett

James T. Bennett is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Materials Chemistry, having authored 109 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (18 papers), Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (11 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (9 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (8 papers), Multiferroics and related materials (8 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (7 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (6 papers) and Local Government Finance and Decentralization (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (168 citations), Economics and Econometrics (368 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (231 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (103 citations) and Strategy and Management (127 citations). James T. Bennett has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Manuel H. Johnson, Thomas J. DiLorenzo, James R. Barth, Andrew J. Bell, Tim P. Comyn, Tim Stevenson, Anthony M. Townsend, Bruce E. Kaufman, Neil McN. Alford and Florian Le Goupil. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Labor Research, Public Choice, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Applied Physics Letters and Economic Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact