David Howell

58 papers receiving 743 citations

Peers

David Howell
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 148
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 105
  • Clinical Psychology 178
  • Political Science and International Relations 175
  • Pharmacy 36
Replace Karen Hill with:
Karen Hill United States
Robin Miller United Kingdom
Sigrid Sterckx Belgium
Mark Elam Sweden
David Cowan United Kingdom
Hilary Thomas United Kingdom
Olav Muurlink Australia
Eileen Thomas United States
Edward M. Glaser Switzerland
Diane Walker United States
David Howell relative to Karen Hill United States Karen Hill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Karen Hill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Howell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Howell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Howell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Howell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Howell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Howell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Howell. The network helps show where David Howell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Howell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Howell Line = papers co-authored together David Howell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Identifying clinical and acute psychological risk factors for PTSD after critical care: a systematic review.
2013121
2 2009117
3 1980107
4 199075
5 202053
6 198949
7 201248
8 200541
9 198628
10 201427
11 201825
12 198819
13 201817
14 200216
15 200213
16
A journey from Aleppo to Jerusalem in 1697
196311
17 197711
18 198710
19 19918
20 20127

About David Howell

David Howell is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Space and Planetary Science, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Political Science and International Relations and Communication, having authored 67 papers that have together received 905 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (9 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (8 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (4 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (3 papers) and Australian History and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (148 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (105 citations), Clinical Psychology (178 citations), Political Science and International Relations (175 citations) and Pharmacy (36 citations). David Howell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Rainer Seidel, Charlotta Windahl, Dorothy Wade, Michael G. Mythen, Rebecca Hardy, James C. Rosen, James C. Scott, Carl H. Landé, Catherine Ann Cline and James Naylor. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Labour / Le Travail, Contemporary British History, Journal of Interprofessional Care and Anthropological Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026