James Mark Baldwin

7.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
38 papers, 530 citations indexed

About

James Mark Baldwin is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Literature and Literary Theory and History. According to data from OpenAlex, James Mark Baldwin has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 530 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 4 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 3 papers in History. Recurrent topics in James Mark Baldwin's work include American and British Literature Analysis (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers). James Mark Baldwin is often cited by papers focused on American and British Literature Analysis (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers). James Mark Baldwin collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. James Mark Baldwin's co-authors include I. V. Yurkevich, Trevor Martin, B. L. Altshuler, Igor V. Lerner, Bjorn Thomas, Pamela S. Miller, Esther Chipps, Cindy Zellefrow, Marjorie M. Kelley and Sharon Tucker and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Physical Review B and JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration.

In The Last Decade

James Mark Baldwin

31 papers receiving 345 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Notes of a Native Son

1955 236 citations James Mark Baldwin Medical Entomology and Zoology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
James Mark Baldwin United Kingdom	10	195	97	61	50	45	38	530
John Corbett China	14	50 0.3×	160 1.6×	107 1.8×	19 0.4×	18 0.4×	57	496
Manfred Jahn Germany	6	109 0.6×	344 3.5×	29 0.5×	43 0.9×	43 1.0×	12	585
Greg Smith United Kingdom	12	130 0.7×	62 0.6×	60 1.0×	22 0.4×	122 2.7×	59	562
John Algeo United States	13	77 0.4×	160 1.6×	40 0.7×	152 3.0×	30 0.7×	83	1.2k
Scott F. Kiesling United States	18	168 0.9×	257 2.6×	33 0.5×	166 3.3×	53 1.2×	48	1.2k
Karl Ameriks United States	17	176 0.9×	27 0.3×	28 0.5×	8 0.2×	49 1.1×	64	1.4k
Edgar Allan Poë Canada	12	86 0.4×	249 2.6×	18 0.3×	13 0.3×	25 0.6×	130	507
Martín Steinmann	6	72 0.4×	40 0.4×	61 1.0×	13 0.3×	27 0.6×	21	469
B. F. McGuinness Italy	5	75 0.4×	57 0.6×	45 0.7×	70 1.4×	17 0.4×	7	545
Richard C. Thurlow United Kingdom	10	140 0.7×	42 0.4×	165 2.7×	65 1.3×	23 0.5×	33	560

Countries citing papers authored by James Mark Baldwin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Mark Baldwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Mark Baldwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Mark Baldwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Mark Baldwin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Mark Baldwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Mark Baldwin. The network helps show where James Mark Baldwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Mark Baldwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Mark Baldwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Mark Baldwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Mark Baldwin. James Mark Baldwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Herlitz, Lauren, et al.. (2024). Care-experienced young people’s views and experiences of accessing general practice and dental services and attending health reviews in England: a qualitative study. BMC Primary Care. 25(1). 318–318.

2.

Chipps, Esther, Marjorie M. Kelley, Cheryl Monturo, et al.. (2022). Reflections From the Middle. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 52(6). 345–351. 15 indexed citations

3.

Baldwin, James Mark. (2018). Thirty More Famous Stories Retold. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew). 1 indexed citations

4.

Baldwin, James Mark. (2017). A new factor in evolution. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 59–80.

5.

Baldwin, James Mark, et al.. (2017). I Am Not Your Negro. 13 indexed citations

6.

Baldwin, James Mark. (2010). Genetic Theory of Reality, Being the Outcome of Genetic Logic as Issuing in the Aesthetic Theory of Reality Called Pancalism, with an Extended Glossary of Terms. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).

7.

Yurkevich, I. V., James Mark Baldwin, Igor V. Lerner, & B. L. Altshuler. (2010). Decoherence of charge qubit coupled to interacting background charges. Physical Review B. 81(12). 20 indexed citations

8.

Martin, Trevor, et al.. (2007). Snooker Robot Player - 20 Years on. Explore Bristol Research. 28. 1–8. 8 indexed citations

9.

Baldwin, James Mark. (2007). Thought and things : a study of the development and meaning of thought; or, Genetic logic.. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew). 18 indexed citations

10.

Baldwin, James Mark, et al.. (2004). Native sons : a friendship that created one of the greatest works of the twentieth century : Notes of a native son. 2 indexed citations

11.

Thomas, Bjorn, et al.. (1999). Road Recognition Using Fuzzy Classifiers. 43.1–43.11. 3 indexed citations

12.

Clarke, John, et al.. (1998). African American Literature. 1 indexed citations

13.

Baldwin, James Mark. (1997). If Black English isn't a Language, Then Tell Me, What Is?. The Black Scholar. 27(1). 5–6. 55 indexed citations

14.

Clark, Dominic A., James Mark Baldwin, H.R. Berenji, et al.. (1988). Responses to “An AI view of the treatment of uncertainty” by Alessandro Saffiotti. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 3(1). 59–86. 5 indexed citations

15.

Baldwin, James Mark. (1987). Expert systems and evidential reasoning. Ablex Publishing Corp. eBooks. 56–67. 1 indexed citations

16.

Binet, Alfred, et al.. (1977). Alterations of personality ; On double consciousness. 1 indexed citations

17.

Baldwin, James Mark, et al.. (1976). Little Man Little Man: A Story of Childhood. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 2 indexed citations

18.

Baldwin, James Mark. (1975). James Baldwin, Nikki Giovanni : a dialogue. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 1 indexed citations

19.

Hall, J. B. & James Mark Baldwin. (1972). James Baldwin, A Transition Interview. Transition. 20–20. 2 indexed citations

20.

Baldwin, James Mark. (1962). History of the eugenic movement.. PubMed. 47. 458–65. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact