Julia Smith

72 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Hit Papers

COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak 2020 · 1.1k citations
1.1k0+7+14Years since publication2505007501000

Peers

Julia Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Modeling and Simulation 321
  • Clinical Psychology 954
  • Health 348
  • General Health Professions 746
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 211
Replace Clare Wenham with:
Clare Wenham United Kingdom
Atheendar Venkataramani United States
Julia Raifman United States
Vicki S. Freimuth United States
Shannon A. McMahon United States
Yong Cai China
Rubeena Zakar Pakistan
Cicely Marston United Kingdom
Cecilia Vindrola‐Padros United Kingdom
Patrick Peretti‐Watel France
Julia Smith relative to Clare Wenham United Kingdom Clare Wenham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Clare Wenham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Smith. The network helps show where Julia Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Smith Line = papers co-authored together Julia Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak
Hit paper breakdown →
20201104
2
Fear and Stigma: The Epidemic within the SARS Outbreak
Hit paper breakdown →
2004536
3 2020182
4 2019143
5 201078
6 202159
7 202258
8 202154
9 201749
10 201647
11 202142
12 202140
13 202235
14 202128
15 201827
16 201827
17 202024
18 202021
19 202121
20 202121

About Julia Smith

Julia Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Gender Studies, having authored 82 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (14 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (10 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (9 papers), HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (7 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (7 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (7 papers), Ethics in medical practice (6 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (321 citations), Clinical Psychology (954 citations), Health (348 citations), General Health Professions (746 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (211 citations). Julia Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rosemary Morgan, Clare Wenham, Kelley Lee, Alan Whiteside, Sara E. Davies, Karen A. Grépin, Sophie Harman, Arthur P. Liang, Marian McDonald and Francisco S. Sy. Their work appears in journals such as Globalization and Health, Global Public Health, Labour / Le Travail, Nursing Ethics and Tobacco Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact