Karl Ameriks
- Philosophy top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Frederick C. BeiserLothar EleyEdmund HusserlLudwig LandgrebeLeslie StevensonPatricia KitcherPaul GuyerAllen W. Wood
- Topics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory (20 papers)Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (6 papers)Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Philosophical ReviewPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Karl Ameriks
53 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Philosophy 997
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 361
- History and Philosophy of Science 232
- Political Science and International Relations 190
- Sociology and Political Science 176
Countries citing papers authored by Karl Ameriks
This map shows the geographic impact of Karl Ameriks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karl Ameriks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karl Ameriks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karl Ameriks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karl Ameriks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karl Ameriks. The network helps show where Karl Ameriks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karl Ameriks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karl Ameriks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karl Ameriks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karl Ameriks. Karl Ameriks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Philosophy and natural sciences | 0 |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | Der Begriff des Staates | 1 |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | Kant and the Fate of Autonomy | 40 |
| 10 | On Schneewind and Kant's Method in Ethics | 5 |
| 11 | The modern subject : conceptions of the self in classical German philosophy | 14 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 200 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 145 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 44 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Karl Ameriks
Karl Ameriks is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (20 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (6 papers) and Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (997 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (232 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (361 citations). Karl Ameriks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Frederick C. Beiser, Lothar Eley, Edmund Husserl, Ludwig Landgrebe, Leslie Stevenson, Patricia Kitcher, Paul Guyer, Allen W. Wood, Gary Hatfield and Charles Parsons. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Philosophical Review and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.