Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The transferable belief model
19941.3k citationsPhilippe Smets, Robert KennesArtificial Intelligenceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Philippe Smets
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Philippe Smets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philippe Smets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philippe Smets more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philippe Smets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philippe Smets. The network helps show where Philippe Smets may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philippe Smets
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philippe Smets.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philippe Smets based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Philippe Smets. Philippe Smets is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smets, Philippe. (2005). Belief functions on real numbers. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 40(3). 181–223.98 indexed citations
2.
Yaghlane, Boutheina Ben, Philippe Smets, & Khaled Mellouli. (2002). Belief function independence: I. The marginal case. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 29(1). 47–70.33 indexed citations
Elouedi, Zied, Khaled Mellouli, & Philippe Smets. (2001). Belief decision trees: theoretical foundations. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 28(2-3). 91–124.80 indexed citations
5.
Dubois, Didier, Henri Prade, & Philippe Smets. (2001). New semantics for quantitative possibility theory.. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 152–161.3 indexed citations
Besnard, Philippe, Anthony Hunter, Dov M. Gabbay, & Philippe Smets. (1998). Handbook of defeasible reasoning and uncertainty management systems: volume 2: reasoning with actual and potential contradictions. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks.11 indexed citations
Smets, Philippe. (1995). The canonical decomposition of a weighted belief. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 42(2). 1896–1901.86 indexed citations
10.
Smets, Philippe. (1994). What is Dempster-Shafer's model?. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks. 5–34.83 indexed citations
11.
Smets, Philippe. (1994). About updating. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 378–385.23 indexed citations
12.
Smets, Philippe. (1993). Probability of deductibility and belief functions. Lecture notes in computer science. 332–340.
Smets, Philippe. (1991). Quantifying Beliefs by Belief Functions: An Axiomatic Justification. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 598–603.10 indexed citations
16.
Kennes, Robert & Philippe Smets. (1990). Computational aspects of the Mobius transformation. arXiv (Cornell University). 401–416.28 indexed citations
17.
Smets, Philippe. (1988). Transferable belief model versus bayesian model. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 495–500.3 indexed citations
Smets, Philippe & Paul Magrez. (1987). Implication in fuzzy logic. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 1(4). 327–347.160 indexed citations
20.
Levi, Salvator, et al.. (1982). RAPPORT EFFICACITE-COUT DE L'ULTRASONOGRAPHIE OBSTETRICALE. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 11(6). 665–675.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.