Cindy Zellefrow

732 total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 479 citations indexed

About

Cindy Zellefrow is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Cindy Zellefrow has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 479 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects and 6 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Cindy Zellefrow's work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (7 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (7 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers). Cindy Zellefrow is often cited by papers focused on Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (7 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (7 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers). Cindy Zellefrow collaborates with scholars based in United States, Trinidad and Tobago and Netherlands. Cindy Zellefrow's co-authors include Sharon Tucker, Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, Alai Tan, Lynn Gallagher‐Ford, Bindu Thomas, Loraine T. Sinnott, Kerry A. Milner, Marjorie M. Kelley, Dónal P O’Mathúna and Esther Chipps and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Nursing, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration and Journal of Nursing Scholarship.

In The Last Decade

Cindy Zellefrow

16 papers receiving 451 citations

Hit Papers

The First U.S. Study on Nurses’ Evidence‐Based Practice C... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cindy Zellefrow United States 11 375 212 121 89 62 17 479
Anna C. Alt‐White United States 13 264 0.7× 58 0.3× 99 0.8× 60 0.7× 12 0.2× 23 414
Ephraim C. Mirafuentes Oman 5 138 0.4× 53 0.3× 34 0.3× 232 2.6× 147 2.4× 7 422
Bindu Thomas United States 11 554 1.5× 361 1.7× 175 1.4× 28 0.3× 5 0.1× 20 616
Inger Jansson Sweden 11 162 0.4× 91 0.4× 103 0.9× 47 0.5× 26 0.4× 31 324
Cindy A. Scherb United States 11 170 0.5× 154 0.7× 32 0.3× 29 0.3× 12 0.2× 28 328
Joyce Batcheller United States 11 158 0.4× 29 0.1× 54 0.4× 51 0.6× 40 0.6× 34 309
Agnes Black Canada 10 273 0.7× 47 0.2× 83 0.7× 15 0.2× 39 0.6× 27 372
Carolyn A. Williams United States 10 229 0.6× 29 0.1× 54 0.4× 51 0.6× 17 0.3× 33 356
Deborah J. Kenny United States 9 181 0.5× 38 0.2× 67 0.6× 30 0.3× 42 0.7× 21 322
Christine W. Nibbelink United States 5 108 0.3× 63 0.3× 75 0.6× 60 0.7× 40 0.6× 8 326

Countries citing papers authored by Cindy Zellefrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cindy Zellefrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cindy Zellefrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cindy Zellefrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cindy Zellefrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cindy Zellefrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cindy Zellefrow. The network helps show where Cindy Zellefrow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cindy Zellefrow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cindy Zellefrow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cindy Zellefrow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cindy Zellefrow. Cindy Zellefrow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Waldrop, Julee, et al.. (2024). Consistent scholarship standards among DNP-prepared faculty needed: Actionable insights. Journal of Professional Nursing. 51. 58–63. 5 indexed citations
2.
Dhakal, Kerry, et al.. (2024). Strategies for incorporating evidence‐based practice into nurse residency programs: A scoping review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 21(4). 407–414. 1 indexed citations
3.
Monturo, Cheryl, Marjorie M. Kelley, Pamela S. Miller, et al.. (2023). Dying from a Distance. 32(3). 155–155. 1 indexed citations
4.
Tschannen, Dana, et al.. (2023). Original Research: Exploring Frontline Nurses' Self-Perceived Levels of QI Engagement and QI Competence. AJN American Journal of Nursing. 123(8). 22–33. 3 indexed citations
5.
Zellefrow, Cindy, et al.. (2023). Identifying best practices for virtual nursing clinical education: A scoping review. Journal of Professional Nursing. 48. 128–146. 9 indexed citations
6.
O’Mathúna, Dónal P, Julia Smith, Inga M. Zadvinskis, et al.. (2023). Ethics and frontline nursing during COVID-19: A qualitative analysis. Nursing Ethics. 30(6). 803–821. 11 indexed citations
7.
Chipps, Esther, Marjorie M. Kelley, Cheryl Monturo, et al.. (2022). Reflections From the Middle. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 52(6). 345–351. 15 indexed citations
8.
Norful, Allison A., Sharon Tucker, Pamela S. Miller, et al.. (2022). Nursing perspectives about the critical gaps in public health emergency response during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 55(1). 22–28. 15 indexed citations
9.
Zellefrow, Cindy, et al.. (2022). The Doctor of Nursing Practice help desk: An innovative approach to developing evidence‐based practice competency and providing DNP project support. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 20(1). 37–43. 1 indexed citations
10.
Tschannen, Dana, et al.. (2021). An Integrative Review of the Barriers and Facilitators to Nurse Engagement in Quality Improvement in the Clinical Practice Setting. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 37(1). 94–100. 17 indexed citations
11.
Tschannen, Dana, et al.. (2021). Quality improvement engagement and competence: A comparison between frontline nurses and nurse leaders. Nursing Outlook. 69(5). 836–847. 12 indexed citations
12.
Kelley, Marjorie M., Inga M. Zadvinskis, Pamela S. Miller, et al.. (2021). United States nurses' experiences during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A grounded theory. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 31(15-16). 2167–2180. 59 indexed citations
13.
Melnyk, Bernadette Mazurek, Cindy Zellefrow, Alai Tan, & Andreanna Pavan Hsieh. (2020). Differences Between Magnet and Non‐Magnet‐Designated Hospitals in Nurses’ Evidence‐Based Practice Knowledge, Competencies, Mentoring, and Culture. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 17(5). 337–347. 22 indexed citations
14.
Tschannen, Dana, et al.. (2020). Development of the Nursing Quality Improvement in Practice Tool. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 35(4). 372–379. 11 indexed citations
15.
Milner, Kerry A., et al.. (2019). Doctor of Nursing Practice Project Advisement: A Roadmap for Faculty and Student Success. Journal of Nursing Education. 58(12). 728–732. 18 indexed citations
16.
Melnyk, Bernadette Mazurek, et al.. (2018). Outcomes From the First Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence‐Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare Invitational Expert Forum. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 15(1). 5–15. 31 indexed citations
17.
Melnyk, Bernadette Mazurek, Lynn Gallagher‐Ford, Cindy Zellefrow, et al.. (2017). The First U.S. Study on Nurses’ Evidence‐Based Practice Competencies Indicates Major Deficits That Threaten Healthcare Quality, Safety, and Patient Outcomes. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 15(1). 16–25. 248 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026