James M. Woolven
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 0.5%
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Ian D. WallMika LindvallMartha S. HeadC. Webster AndrewsBrian ClarkeGregory L. WarrenCatherine E. PeishoffGiovanna Tedesco
- Topics
- Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (3 papers)Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers)Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Cell ScienceJournal of Medicinal ChemistryBioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandUnited States
In The Last Decade
James M. Woolven
13 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 923
- Organic Chemistry 443
- Materials Chemistry 229
- Oncology 195
Countries citing papers authored by James M. Woolven
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Woolven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Woolven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Woolven more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Woolven
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Woolven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Woolven. The network helps show where James M. Woolven may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Woolven
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Woolven. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Woolven based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Woolven. James M. Woolven is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 145 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 106 | |
| 9 | 86 | |
| 10 | A Critical Assessment of Docking Programs and Scoring Functionsbreakdown → | 1339 |
| 11 | 166 | |
| 12 | 62 | |
| 13 | 54 |
About James M. Woolven
James M. Woolven is a scholar working on Hematology, Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 13 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers) and Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (923 citations), Molecular Biology (1.3k citations) and Organic Chemistry (443 citations). James M. Woolven has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian D. Wall, Mika Lindvall, Martha S. Head, C. Webster Andrews, Brian Clarke, Gregory L. Warren, Catherine E. Peishoff, Giovanna Tedesco, Neysa Nevins and Simon F. Semus. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cell Science, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.