James M. Penning
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- David I. KertzerCorwin E. SmidtJim WallisMary C. SegersMark J. RozellCharles S. BullockTed G. JelenBrent F. Nelsen
- Topics
- Religion and Society Interactions (10 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal for the Scientific Study of ReligionThe Journal of Southern HistoryReview of Religious Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
James M. Penning
17 papers receiving 518 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Sociology and Political Science 455
- Political Science and International Relations 243
- Anthropology 128
- Social Psychology 67
- Cultural Studies 51
Countries citing papers authored by James M. Penning
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Penning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Penning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Penning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Penning
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Penning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Penning. The network helps show where James M. Penning may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Penning
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Penning. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Penning based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Penning. James M. Penning is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Ritual, Politics, and Powerbreakdown → | 506 |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 41 |
About James M. Penning
James M. Penning is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and History, having authored 19 papers that have together received 710 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (10 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (128 citations), Archeology (12 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (455 citations). James M. Penning has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David I. Kertzer, Corwin E. Smidt, Jim Wallis, Mary C. Segers, Mark J. Rozell, Charles S. Bullock, Ted G. Jelen, Brent F. Nelsen, James L. Guth and Kenneth D. Wald. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, The Journal of Southern History and Review of Religious Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.