James M. M. Good
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Music top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jane W. DavidsonArthur StillRobert W. KentridgeJohn P. AggletonRoland RobertsonJames MasonAtle ØdegårdIngunn T. Ellingsen
- Topics
- Social Representations and Identity (5 papers)Q Methodology Applications (5 papers)Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsProceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesJournal of Health Psychology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
James M. M. Good
21 papers receiving 416 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Cognitive Neuroscience 182
- Social Psychology 130
- Sociology and Political Science 85
- Music 79
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 69
Countries citing papers authored by James M. M. Good
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. M. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. M. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. M. Good more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. M. Good
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. M. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. M. Good. The network helps show where James M. M. Good may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. M. Good
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. M. Good. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. M. Good based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. M. Good. James M. M. Good is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 64 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 48 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About James M. M. Good
James M. M. Good is a scholar working on General Psychology, Developmental Biology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 22 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Representations and Identity (5 papers), Q Methodology Applications (5 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (43 citations), Music (79 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (182 citations). James M. M. Good has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jane W. Davidson, Arthur Still, Robert W. Kentridge, John P. Aggleton, Roland Robertson, James Mason, Atle Ødegård, Ingunn T. Ellingsen, Nadja Reissland and D. M. Burt. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Journal of Health Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.