James M. M. Good

854 total citations
22 papers, 493 citations indexed

About

James M. M. Good is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research and General Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, James M. M. Good has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 493 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Social Psychology, 5 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 4 papers in General Psychology. Recurrent topics in James M. M. Good's work include Q Methodology Applications (5 papers), Social Representations and Identity (5 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers). James M. M. Good is often cited by papers focused on Q Methodology Applications (5 papers), Social Representations and Identity (5 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers). James M. M. Good collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and United States. James M. M. Good's co-authors include Jane W. Davidson, Arthur Still, Robert W. Kentridge, John P. Aggleton, Roland Robertson, Atle Ødegård, James Mason, Nadja Reissland, Ingunn T. Ellingsen and D. M. Burt and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Journal of Health Psychology.

In The Last Decade

James M. M. Good

21 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James M. M. Good United Kingdom 11 182 130 85 79 69 22 493
Francis Sparshott Canada 13 116 0.6× 75 0.6× 89 1.0× 54 0.7× 133 1.9× 91 661
Andrew S. Winston Canada 13 151 0.8× 210 1.6× 99 1.2× 5 0.1× 157 2.3× 52 596
Mark B. N. Hansen United States 12 104 0.6× 68 0.5× 265 3.1× 18 0.2× 76 1.1× 32 823
Denis Dutton New Zealand 12 168 0.9× 91 0.7× 120 1.4× 21 0.3× 150 2.2× 36 600
Harold Osborne 13 95 0.5× 64 0.5× 61 0.7× 15 0.2× 89 1.3× 68 477
Sarah Ransdell United States 19 246 1.4× 91 0.7× 54 0.6× 18 0.2× 151 2.2× 57 1.0k
Alastair Hannay Norway 11 91 0.5× 39 0.3× 99 1.2× 5 0.1× 87 1.3× 44 439
Richard C. McCleary 3 59 0.3× 64 0.5× 149 1.8× 13 0.2× 86 1.2× 5 463
Luc Faucher Canada 8 121 0.7× 93 0.7× 140 1.6× 2 0.0× 35 0.5× 38 401
David Pariser Canada 11 71 0.4× 48 0.4× 91 1.1× 47 0.6× 164 2.4× 36 478

Countries citing papers authored by James M. M. Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James M. M. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. M. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. M. Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James M. M. Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. M. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. M. Good. The network helps show where James M. M. Good may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. M. Good

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. M. Good. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. M. Good based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. M. Good. James M. M. Good is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ellingsen, Ingunn T., et al.. (2016). Combining a Naturalistic and Theoretical Q Sample Approach: An Empirical Research Illustration. Universiteitsbibliotheek EUR. 38(2). 15–32. 9 indexed citations
2.
Ellingsen, Ingunn T., et al.. (2016). Combining a Naturalistic and Theoretical. Operant Subjectivity. 38(2). 3 indexed citations
3.
Good, James M. M., et al.. (2013). A Q-methodology study of parental understandings of infant immunisation: Implications for health-care advice. Journal of Health Psychology. 20(11). 1451–1462. 10 indexed citations
4.
Wolf, Amanda, James M. M. Good, Steven R. Brown, et al.. (2011). Q Methodology and its Applications: Reflections on Theory. Operant Subjectivity. 35(1). 1 indexed citations
5.
Wolf, Amanda, James M. M. Good, Steven R. Brown, et al.. (2011). Q Methodology and its Applications: Reflections on Theory. Universiteitsbibliotheek EUR. 2 indexed citations
6.
Good, James M. M.. (2010). Introduction to William Stephenson's Quest for a Science of Subjectivity. Psychoanalysis and History. 12(2). 211–243. 16 indexed citations
7.
Good, James M. M.. (2007). The Affordances for Social Psychology of the Ecological Approach to Social Knowing. Theory & Psychology. 17(2). 265–295. 64 indexed citations
8.
Corbett, Sally, et al.. (2007). Adolescent motherhood: a Q‐methodological re‐evaluation of psychological and social outcomes. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 17(5). 347–362. 5 indexed citations
9.
Burt, D. M., Robert W. Kentridge, James M. M. Good, et al.. (2007). Q-cgi: new techniques to assess variation in perception applied to facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 274(1627). 2779–2784. 14 indexed citations
10.
Good, James M. M.. (2003). William Stephenson, Quantum Theory, and Q Methodology. Operant Subjectivity. 26(4). 1 indexed citations
11.
Davidson, Jane W. & James M. M. Good. (2002). Social and Musical Co-Ordination between Members of a String Quartet: An Exploratory Study. Psychology of Music. 30(2). 186–201. 124 indexed citations
12.
Good, James M. M.. (2000). Disciplining social psychology: A case study of boundary relations in the history of the human sciences. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 36(4). 383–403. 34 indexed citations
13.
Still, Arthur & James M. M. Good. (1998). The Ontology of Mutualism. Ecological Psychology. 10(1). 39–63. 30 indexed citations
14.
Good, James M. M., et al.. (1998). The Politics of Postmodernity. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 48 indexed citations
15.
Good, James M. M., et al.. (1997). Measuring Musical Aptitude in Children: On the Role of Age, Handedness, Scholastic Achievement, and Socioeconomic Status. Psychology of Music. 25(1). 57–69. 12 indexed citations
16.
Robertson, Roland, et al.. (1994). The Recovery of Rhetoric: Persuasive Discourse and Disciplinarity in the Human Sciences.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 23(5). 765–765. 35 indexed citations
17.
Aggleton, John P., Robert W. Kentridge, & James M. M. Good. (1994). Handedness and Musical Ability: A Study of Professional Orchestral Players, Composers, and Choir Members. Psychology of Music. 22(2). 148–156. 40 indexed citations
18.
Good, James M. M. & Arthur Still. (1992). The idea of an interdisciplinary social psychology: An historical and rhetorical analysis.. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne. 33(3). 563–568. 6 indexed citations
19.
Still, Arthur & James M. M. Good. (1992). Mutualism in the Human Sciences: Towards the implementation of a theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 22(2). 105–128. 32 indexed citations
20.
Good, James M. M.. (1981). William Taylor, Robert Southey, and the Word "Autobiography". The Wordsworth Circle. 12(2). 125–127. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026