Atle Ødegård

711 total citations
45 papers, 469 citations indexed

About

Atle Ødegård is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Atle Ødegård has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 469 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in General Health Professions, 18 papers in Clinical Psychology and 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Atle Ødegård's work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (17 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (9 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (7 papers). Atle Ødegård is often cited by papers focused on Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (17 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (9 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (7 papers). Atle Ødegård collaborates with scholars based in Norway, United Kingdom and Denmark. Atle Ødegård's co-authors include Elisabeth Willumsen, Stål Bjørkly, Sarah Hean, Bengt Åhgren, Jon Ivar Håvold, Charlotte Wegener, Åshild Slettebø, Susanne Lindqvist, Ingunn T. Ellingsen and James M. M. Good and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Safety Science.

In The Last Decade

Atle Ødegård

36 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Atle Ødegård Norway 12 312 156 72 63 54 45 469
Roger Dunston Australia 12 356 1.1× 74 0.5× 42 0.6× 49 0.8× 145 2.7× 24 547
Mimi Choy-Brown United States 14 328 1.1× 94 0.6× 55 0.8× 50 0.8× 36 0.7× 36 425
Mary Lehman Held United States 12 191 0.6× 209 1.3× 35 0.5× 147 2.3× 39 0.7× 52 393
Sarah Gordon New Zealand 14 433 1.4× 142 0.9× 19 0.3× 62 1.0× 55 1.0× 60 610
Andries Baart Netherlands 12 182 0.6× 79 0.5× 17 0.2× 66 1.0× 69 1.3× 33 331
Natalie D. Pope United States 12 178 0.6× 132 0.8× 73 1.0× 153 2.4× 31 0.6× 41 470
Cheryl Kipping United Kingdom 6 282 0.9× 178 1.1× 11 0.2× 68 1.1× 70 1.3× 12 512
Rosalyn Bertram United States 7 190 0.6× 111 0.7× 45 0.6× 30 0.5× 16 0.3× 17 328
Jill Doner Kagle United States 10 238 0.8× 157 1.0× 122 1.7× 112 1.8× 35 0.6× 19 487
Shayne Walker New Zealand 6 117 0.4× 54 0.3× 56 0.8× 61 1.0× 40 0.7× 20 294

Countries citing papers authored by Atle Ødegård

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Atle Ødegård's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Atle Ødegård with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Atle Ødegård more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Atle Ødegård

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Atle Ødegård. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Atle Ødegård. The network helps show where Atle Ødegård may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Atle Ødegård

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Atle Ødegård. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Atle Ødegård based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Atle Ødegård. Atle Ødegård is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Ødegård, Atle, et al.. (2025). Teachers’ perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in higher education: Contributions to a framework. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 11. 101300–101300. 1 indexed citations
3.
Hean, Sarah, et al.. (2025). Exploring relational and structuring skills among Norwegian probation officers during mandatory supervision sessions. European Journal of Probation. 17(1). 35–51.
5.
Hean, Sarah, et al.. (2021). Exploring Norwegian prison frontline workers’ perceptions of interprofessional collaboration – a pilot study. International Journal of Prisoner Health. 18(4). 429–442. 1 indexed citations
6.
Jörns‐Presentati, Astrid, Gunter Groen, & Atle Ødegård. (2021). Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Perception of Interprofessional Collaboration Model-Questionnaire (PINCOM-Q). International Journal of Integrated Care. 21(4). 3–3. 4 indexed citations
7.
Hean, Sarah, et al.. (2019). A conceptual model on reintegration after prison in Norway. International Journal of Prisoner Health. 15(3). 282–292. 10 indexed citations
8.
Lindqvist, Susanne, et al.. (2018). University teachers’ views of interprofessional learning and their role in achieving outcomes - a qualitative study. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 33(2). 190–199. 17 indexed citations
9.
Hean, Sarah, Elisabeth Willumsen, & Atle Ødegård. (2018). Making sense of interactions between mental health and criminal justice services: the utility of cultural historical activity systems theory. International Journal of Prisoner Health. 14(2). 124–141. 7 indexed citations
10.
Hean, Sarah, Atle Ødegård, & Elisabeth Willumsen. (2017). Improving collaboration between professionals supporting mentally ill offenders. International Journal of Prisoner Health. 13(2). 91–104. 9 indexed citations
11.
Ødegård, Atle, et al.. (2016). Factor Analytical Examination of the Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs Scale: Indications of a Two-Factor Structure. Open Journal of Nursing. 6(9). 699–711. 8 indexed citations
12.
Hean, Sarah, Elisabeth Willumsen, Atle Ødegård, & Stål Bjørkly. (2015). Using Social Innovation as a Theoretical Framework to Guide Future Thinking on Facilitating Collaboration Between Mental Health and Criminal Justice Services. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 14(4). 280–289. 6 indexed citations
13.
Ødegård, Atle, et al.. (2014). Perceptions of Interprofessional Collaboration. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(3). 20 indexed citations
14.
Ødegård, Atle & Stål Bjørkly. (2012). A mixed method approach to clarify the construct validity of interprofessional collaboration: An empirical research illustration. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 26(4). 283–288. 14 indexed citations
15.
Ødegård, Atle, et al.. (2009). Testing the Diagnosis of Dissociative Identity Disorder Through Measures of Dissociation, Absorption, Hypnotizability and PTSD: A Norwegian Pilot Study. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation. 10(1). 102–112. 14 indexed citations
16.
Ødegård, Atle, et al.. (2009). Perceptions of interprofessional collaboration within child mental health care in Norway. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 23(3). 286–296. 55 indexed citations
17.
Ødegård, Atle, Knut A. Hagtvet, & Stål Bjørkly. (2008). Applying aspects of generalizability theory in preliminary validation of the Multifacet Interprofessional Collaboration Model (PINCOM). International Journal of Integrated Care. 8(4). e74–e74. 10 indexed citations
18.
Ødegård, Atle. (2007). Time used on interprofessional collaboration in child mental health care. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 21(1). 45–54. 18 indexed citations
19.
Ødegård, Atle. (2006). Exploring perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in child mental health care. International Journal of Integrated Care. 6(4). e25–e25. 74 indexed citations
20.
Ødegård, Atle. (2005). Perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in relation to children with mental health problems. A pilot study. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 19(4). 347–357. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026