James Kramer

17 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

James Kramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 843
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 279
  • Molecular Biology 638
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 90
  • Analytical Chemistry 39
Replace Elisa Passini with:
Elisa Passini United Kingdom
Khuram W. Chaudhary United States
Jennifer Beck Pierson United States
J‐P Valentin United Kingdom
Sara Dutta United Kingdom
An N. Hermans Belgium
Karel Van Ammel Belgium
David J. Gallacher Belgium
Henry H. Holzgrefe United States
Jean‐Michel Guillon France
James Kramer relative to Elisa Passini United Kingdom Elisa Passini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Elisa Passini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Kramer. The network helps show where James Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Kramer Line = papers co-authored together James Kramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2013289
2 2015246
3 2013149
4 2018128
5 1998101
6 200777
7 202042
8 202039
9 201533
10 202127
11 202014
12 20236
13 20256
14 19963
15 20083
16 19941
17 20031
18 20150
19 20250

About James Kramer

James Kramer is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Medical Laboratory Technology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (10 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (8 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (2 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (1 paper), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (1 paper) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (843 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (279 citations), Molecular Biology (638 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (90 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (39 citations). James Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Arthur M Brown, Yuri A. Kuryshev, Andrew Bruening‐Wright, Carlos A. Obejero‐Paz, Glenn J. Myatt, Joseph S. Verducci, Glenn E. Kirsch, Scott A. Shell, Robert L. Wappel and Patricia B. Trusk. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, The Journal of Membrane Biology and Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact