James Jonathon Pitt

114 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

James Jonathon Pitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Clinical Biochemistry 1.5k
  • Biochemistry 220
  • Molecular Biology 1.9k
  • Rheumatology 346
  • Spectroscopy 392
Replace Rodney J. Pollitt with:
Rodney J. Pollitt United Kingdom
Sybe K. Wadman Netherlands
K. Bartlett United Kingdom
Rudolf Flückiger United States
Mortimer Levitz United States
M. Durán Netherlands
Mendel Tuchman United States
Huiwen Zhang China
León E. Rosenberg United States
Diane Wilson Cox Canada
James Jonathon Pitt relative to Rodney J. Pollitt United Kingdom Rodney J. Pollitt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Rodney J. Pollitt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Jonathon Pitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Jonathon Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Jonathon Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Jonathon Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Jonathon Pitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Jonathon Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Jonathon Pitt. The network helps show where James Jonathon Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Jonathon Pitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Jonathon Pitt Line = papers co-authored together James Jonathon Pitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 118 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011311
2
Principles and applications of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in clinical biochemistry.
2009285
3 2002223
4 2010156
5 2009140
6 2014116
7 2002100
8 201488
9 199884
10 200683
11 199778
12 200874
13 201069
14 201564
15 201563
16 200362
17 201258
18 200954
19 200253
20 201253

About James Jonathon Pitt

James Jonathon Pitt is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Physiology and Rheumatology, having authored 118 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (57 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (19 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (12 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (10 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (8 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (7 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (7 papers) and Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (1.5k citations), Biochemistry (220 citations), Molecular Biology (1.9k citations), Rheumatology (346 citations) and Spectroscopy (392 citations). James Jonathon Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey John Gorman, Tristan P. Wallis, Heidi L Peters, Avihu Boneh, Joy Yaplito‐Lee, Stephen G. Kahler, Sacha Ferdinandusse, Eileen P. Treacy, Ronald J. A. Wanders and Jos P.N. Ruiter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, Clinical Chemistry, Journal of Biological Chemistry and The American Journal of Human Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact