James Harland

2.2k total citations
106 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

James Harland is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Computational Theory and Mathematics. According to data from OpenAlex, James Harland has authored 106 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 63 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 24 papers in Information Systems and 21 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics. Recurrent topics in James Harland's work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (40 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (29 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (18 papers). James Harland is often cited by papers focused on Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (40 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (29 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (18 papers). James Harland collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. James Harland's co-authors include John Thangarajah, Margaret Hamilton, Dip Nandi, Lin Padgham, Michael Winikoff, David Pym, Maria Spichkova, Tawfeeq Alsanoosy, Neil Yorke‐Smith and Daryl D’Souza and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Europhysics Letters (EPL) and Theoretical Computer Science.

In The Last Decade

James Harland

96 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James Harland Australia 19 575 237 237 207 133 106 1.1k
Edward F. Gehringer United States 21 298 0.5× 598 2.5× 535 2.3× 352 1.7× 222 1.7× 181 1.6k
Carsten Ullrich Germany 16 256 0.4× 242 1.0× 246 1.0× 151 0.7× 133 1.0× 88 846
Ann Q. Gates United States 15 237 0.4× 219 0.9× 123 0.5× 129 0.6× 40 0.3× 96 798
Nicola Henze Germany 14 559 1.0× 467 2.0× 416 1.8× 73 0.4× 201 1.5× 51 983
Agathe Merceron Germany 15 419 0.7× 379 1.6× 802 3.4× 162 0.8× 101 0.8× 68 1.1k
Peter Dolog Denmark 19 620 1.1× 631 2.7× 370 1.6× 70 0.3× 120 0.9× 82 1.2k
A. Joe Turner United States 8 127 0.2× 397 1.7× 581 2.5× 77 0.4× 96 0.7× 21 1.1k
François Bry Germany 17 622 1.1× 265 1.1× 67 0.3× 58 0.3× 38 0.3× 146 936
Kathi Fisler United States 20 717 1.2× 553 2.3× 475 2.0× 74 0.4× 183 1.4× 85 1.5k
Richard J. LeBlanc United States 18 292 0.5× 693 2.9× 406 1.7× 89 0.4× 91 0.7× 82 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by James Harland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Harland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Harland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Harland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Harland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Harland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Harland. The network helps show where James Harland may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Harland

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Harland. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Harland based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Harland. James Harland is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Alsanoosy, Tawfeeq, Maria Spichkova, & James Harland. (2020). A Framework for Identifying Cultural Influences on Requirements Engineering Activities. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 4 indexed citations
2.
Alsanoosy, Tawfeeq, Maria Spichkova, & James Harland. (2019). Cultural Influence on Requirements Engineering Activities: Australian Practitioners’ View. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2 indexed citations
3.
Thangarajah, John, James Harland, & Neil Yorke‐Smith. (2015). Estimating the Progress of Maintenance Goals. Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems. 1645–1646. 3 indexed citations
4.
Abushark, Yoosef B., John Thangarajah, Tim Miller, James Harland, & Michael Winikoff. (2015). Early Detection of Design Faults Relative to Requirement Specifications in Agent-Based Models. Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems. 1071–1079. 7 indexed citations
5.
Abushark, Yoosef B., John Thangarajah, Tim Miller, & James Harland. (2014). Checking consistency of agent designs against interaction protocols for early-phase defect location. Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems. 933–940. 8 indexed citations
6.
Kay, Judy, Raymond Lister, Norma P. Simon, et al.. (2013). A conceptual model for reflecting on expected learning vs. demonstrated student performance. Australasian Computing Education Conference. 136. 77–86. 7 indexed citations
7.
Lister, Raymond, Daryl D’Souza, Margaret Hamilton, et al.. (2012). Toward a shared understanding of competency in programming: An invitation to the BABELnot project. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 12 indexed citations
8.
Alsaggaf, Wafaa, Margaret Hamilton, James Harland, & Daryl D’Souza. (2012). The use of laptop computers in programming lectures. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 1–11. 1 indexed citations
9.
Bertök, Péter, et al.. (2012). µ-Fractal based data perturbation algorithm for privacy protection. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 148. 3 indexed citations
10.
D’Souza, Daryl, et al.. (2008). Transforming learning of programming: A mentoring project. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 1 indexed citations
11.
Harland, James, et al.. (2004). Observation expectation reasoning in agent systems. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. 246–254. 3 indexed citations
12.
Hamilton, Margaret, James Harland, & Lin Padgham. (2003). Experiences in teaching computing theory via aspects of problem-based learning. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 207–211. 5 indexed citations
13.
Winikoff, Michael, Lin Padgham, James Harland, & John Thangarajah. (2002). Declarative and procedural goals in intelligent agent systems. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 470–481. 109 indexed citations
14.
Harland, James & Michael Winikoff. (2001). Agents via Mixed-mode Computation in Linear Logic: A Proposal. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 2 indexed citations
15.
Harland, James, David Pym, & Michael Winikoff. (2000). Forward and Backward Chaining in Linear Logic. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science. 37. 1–16. 5 indexed citations
16.
Harland, James & Michael Winikoff. (1998). Making Logic Programs Reactive. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 2 indexed citations
17.
Ramamohanarao, Kotagiri, et al.. (1993). Status of the Aditi deductive database system. International Conference on Logic Programming. 851. 1 indexed citations
18.
Harland, James & Kotagiri Ramamohanarao. (1993). Constraint propagation for linear recursive rules. International Conference on Logic Programming. 683–699. 3 indexed citations
19.
Harland, James & David Pym. (1992). On Resolution in Fragments of Classical Linear Logic. International Conference on Logic Programming. 30–41. 4 indexed citations
20.
Harland, James. (1991). A Clausal Form for the Completion of Logic Programs.. International Conference on Lightning Protection. 711–725. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026