James Grantham Turner
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- History top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Anthropology
- Co-authors
- Christopher ThackerRalph HoulbrookeElaine V. BeilinAdrian L. JamesColin RogersPatricia EastealPhilip BirchPeter R. Tait
- Topics
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (4 papers)Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers)Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
James Grantham Turner
15 papers receiving 74 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Literature and Literary Theory 52
- History 43
- Sociology and Political Science 33
- Political Science and International Relations 22
- Anthropology 20
Countries citing papers authored by James Grantham Turner
This map shows the geographic impact of James Grantham Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Grantham Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Grantham Turner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Grantham Turner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Grantham Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Grantham Turner. The network helps show where James Grantham Turner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Grantham Turner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Grantham Turner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Grantham Turner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Grantham Turner. James Grantham Turner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | Art and Love in Renaissance Italy | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Politics, poetics, and hermeneutics in Milton's prose : essays | 0 |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | The Impact of Domestic Violence on Individuals | 1 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | One Flesh: Paradisal Marriage and Sexual Relations in the Age of Milton | 65 |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About James Grantham Turner
James Grantham Turner is a scholar working on Classics, Literature and Literary Theory and History, having authored 23 papers that have together received 146 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (4 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers) and Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (52 citations), Classics (16 citations) and History (43 citations). James Grantham Turner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Thacker, Ralph Houlbrooke, Elaine V. Beilin, Adrian L. James, Colin Rogers, Patricia Easteal, Philip Birch, Peter R. Tait, Joanne C. Duke and David Loewenstein. Their work appears in journals such as Sixteenth Century Journal, Representations and The Art Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.