Kate Chedgzoy
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Anthropology
- Co-authors
- Anne WhiteheadJohn RichardsSuzanne TrillJulie SandersSusan WisemanKatharine HodgkinRamona WrayElspeth Graham
- Topics
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (5 papers)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers)Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Kate Chedgzoy
18 papers receiving 90 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Literature and Literary Theory 66
- Sociology and Political Science 51
- History 49
- Social Psychology 31
- Anthropology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Chedgzoy
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Chedgzoy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Chedgzoy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Chedgzoy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Chedgzoy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Chedgzoy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Chedgzoy. The network helps show where Kate Chedgzoy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Chedgzoy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Chedgzoy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Chedgzoy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Chedgzoy. Kate Chedgzoy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 41 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | In a queer place: sexuality and belonging in British and European contexts | 2 |
| 12 | Early modern women poets (1520-1700) : an anthology | 0 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Refashioning Ben Jonson : gender, politics and the Jonsonian Canon | 10 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | Lay by Your Needles Ladies. Take the Pen | 1 |
| 17 | “Two loves I have”: Shakespeare and bisexuality | 3 |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | The (pregnant) prince and the showgirl: Cultural legitimacy and the reproduction of Hamlet in | 0 |
| 20 | Impudent women: Gender and carnival in early modern culture | 1 |
About Kate Chedgzoy
Kate Chedgzoy is a scholar working on History, Literature and Literary Theory and Anthropology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 149 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (5 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (66 citations), History (49 citations) and Classics (14 citations). Kate Chedgzoy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anne Whitehead, John Richards, Suzanne Trill, Julie Sanders, Susan Wiseman, Katharine Hodgkin, Ramona Wray, Elspeth Graham, Robert Shaughnessy and M. Osborne. Their work appears in journals such as GLQ A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, Memory Studies and TDR/The Drama Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.