James Foreit

459 citations
19 papers · 280 indexed · h-index 10

James Foreit

18 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

James Foreit
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 125
  • General Health Professions 146
  • General Decision Sciences 8
  • Finance 30
  • Emergency Medical Services 20
Replace S. Vere Pearson with:
S. Vere Pearson United Kingdom
Jeroen van Ginneken Netherlands
Kiddus Yitbarek Ethiopia
Alison Hernández Sweden
Merridy Grant South Africa
Antoine Augustin United States
Pranita Achyut United States
Rachel Hammonds Belgium
Pierre Ngom Ghana
Satyanarayan Mohanty United States
James Foreit relative to S. Vere Pearson United Kingdom S. Vere Pearson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
S. Vere Pearson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Foreit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Foreit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Foreit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Foreit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Foreit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Foreit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Foreit. The network helps show where James Foreit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside James Foreit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Foreit Line = papers co-authored together James Foreit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 20130
2 201117
3 200241
4 20012
5
Willingness to pay for well-family midwife services in the Philippines.
20011
6 199987
7 199911
8 199814
9 19985
10
The mass media and health beliefs: using media campaigns to promote preventive behavior.
19932
11 199317
12 19929
13 19901
14
An experiment in Callao Peru to protect high risk women from AIDS and other STDs.
19881
15 198413
16 19822
17
The transition in Korean family planning behavior, 1935-1976: a retrospective cohort analysis.
19822
18 198121
19 197834

About James Foreit

James Foreit is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Gender Studies, having authored 19 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (8 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper) and Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (125 citations), General Health Professions (146 citations) and General Decision Sciences (8 citations). James Foreit has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Karen G. Foreit, John Bratt, Barbara Janowitz, Sarah Raifman, Tomáš Frejka, Ricardo Vernon, Félix Guillén García, James E. Rosen, F. Stephen Wignall and Jorge Alarcón. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Family Planning, Health Policy and Planning, Population and Environment, Health Policy and World health & population.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026