Health Policy and Planning

2.9k papers and 88.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Health Policy and Planning in the last decades have received a total of 88.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Health Policy and Planning usually cover Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.5k papers), General Health Professions (1.2k papers) and Finance (926 papers) specifically the topics of Global Maternal and Child Health (1.5k papers), Financing of Health Care Systems and Universal Coverage (919 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (434 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health Policy and Planning are Lucy Gilson, L. Kumaranayake, Seema Vyas, Trudy Harpham, Ruairı́ Brugha, Tim Ensor, Jeremy Shiffman, Soonman Kwon, Gill Walt and Rifat Atun.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Health Policy and Planning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Health Policy and Planning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health Policy and Planning.

Countries where authors publish in Health Policy and Planning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health Policy and Planning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health Policy and Planning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Policy and Planning more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025