James F. Brooks
- Anthropology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Marketing
- Co-authors
- Elliott WestLeslie C. AielloJohn L. KessellJuliana BarrJohn-Paul B. ClarkeAlbert J. ChangBernhard HengstTim Chambers
- Topics
- Archaeology and Natural History (7 papers)Latin American and Latino Studies (4 papers)American Environmental and Regional History (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
James F. Brooks
17 papers receiving 279 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Anthropology 129
- Sociology and Political Science 120
- Cultural Studies 66
- Political Science and International Relations 50
- Marketing 39
Countries citing papers authored by James F. Brooks
This map shows the geographic impact of James F. Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James F. Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James F. Brooks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James F. Brooks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James F. Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James F. Brooks. The network helps show where James F. Brooks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James F. Brooks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James F. Brooks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James F. Brooks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James F. Brooks. James F. Brooks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 53 | |
| 6 | 98 | |
| 7 | Flight Trials of CDA with Time-Based Metering at Atlanta International Airport | 3 |
| 8 | Women and gender in the American West : Jensen-Miller Prize essays from the coalition for Western women's history | 1 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | Women and Gender in the American West | 4 |
| 11 | The UNSW RoboCup 2002 Legged League Team | 4 |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 149 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | The Case for Creating Compensation Programs to Aid Victims of Violent Crimes | 0 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About James F. Brooks
James F. Brooks is a scholar working on Anthropology, Cultural Studies and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 23 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Natural History (7 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (4 papers) and American Environmental and Regional History (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (129 citations), Cultural Studies (66 citations) and Archeology (6 citations). James F. Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Elliott West, Leslie C. Aiello, John L. Kessell, Juliana Barr, John-Paul B. Clarke, Albert J. Chang, Bernhard Hengst, Tim Chambers, Liling Ren and Claude Sammut. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Current Anthropology and Law & Society Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.