James E. Owers

1.5k total citations
44 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

James E. Owers is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, James E. Owers has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Accounting, 22 papers in Strategy and Management and 17 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in James E. Owers's work include Corporate Finance and Governance (30 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (18 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (11 papers). James E. Owers is often cited by papers focused on Corporate Finance and Governance (30 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (18 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (11 papers). James E. Owers collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Ireland. James E. Owers's co-authors include Gailen L. Hite, Ronald C. Rogers, Michael Lubatkin, Kae H. Chung, Mark A. Chen, Daniel Greene, Alison Alexander, Chinmoy Ghosh, Patrick J. Kaufmann and Delroy M. Hunter and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Financial Economics and Journal of Business Research.

In The Last Decade

James E. Owers

40 papers receiving 958 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
James E. Owers United States	12	971	462	422	239	115	44	1.1k
Meziane Lasfer United Kingdom	20	1.4k 1.4×	611 1.3×	447 1.1×	425 1.8×	92 0.8×	62	1.6k
David A. Whidbee United States	12	854 0.9×	454 1.0×	250 0.6×	174 0.7×	60 0.5×	28	966
Ronald M. Schmidt China	2	906 0.9×	239 0.5×	370 0.9×	175 0.7×	118 1.0×	5	979
Sudi Sudarsanam United Kingdom	15	846 0.9×	273 0.6×	375 0.9×	157 0.7×	75 0.7×	21	975
Erik Devos United States	13	788 0.8×	456 1.0×	270 0.6×	383 1.6×	34 0.3×	52	992
Bang Dang Nguyen United Kingdom	11	819 0.8×	235 0.5×	268 0.6×	133 0.6×	101 0.9×	18	925
Jennifer E. Bethel United States	10	987 1.0×	368 0.8×	340 0.8×	173 0.7×	119 1.0×	21	1.1k
Robert Daines United States	10	925 1.0×	287 0.6×	385 0.9×	217 0.9×	35 0.3×	17	1.0k
Stacey R. Kole United States	8	943 1.0×	339 0.7×	406 1.0×	220 0.9×	83 0.7×	11	1.1k
Shan Zhao Hong Kong	12	820 0.8×	275 0.6×	352 0.8×	191 0.8×	71 0.6×	30	1000

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Owers

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Owers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Owers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Owers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Owers

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Owers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Owers. The network helps show where James E. Owers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. Owers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. Owers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. Owers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James E. Owers. James E. Owers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Sergi, Bruno S., James E. Owers, & Alison Alexander. (2019). Valuation changes associated with the FOX/Disney divestiture transaction. Economics & Sociology. 12(2). 36–47. 4 indexed citations

Chen, Mark A., Daniel Greene, & James E. Owers. (2014). The Costs and Benefits of Clawback Provisions in CEO Compensation. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 4(1). 108–154. 51 indexed citations

Hunter, Delroy M., et al.. (2012). Does Deposit Insurance Retard the Development of Financial Markets?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

Chen, Mark A., Daniel Greene, & James E. Owers. (2012). The Costs and Benefits of CEO Clawback Provisions: Theory and Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations

Owers, James E., et al.. (2010). The Association Between –Market Risk Disclosure Reporting And Firm Risk: The Impact Of SEC FRR No. 48. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR). 26(4). 9 indexed citations

Owers, James E., et al.. (2007). The Interaction of Corporate Dividend Policy and Capital Structure Decisions Under Differential Tax Regimes. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

DaDalt, Peter J., et al.. (2002). Canadian Acquisitions of U.S. Divested Assets. International Journal of Business. 7(1). 1. 3 indexed citations

Owers, James E., et al.. (2000). The International Attributes and Return Performance of Newly-Listed American Depositary Receipts. International Journal of Business. 5(1). 1. 2 indexed citations

Owers, James E., et al.. (1996). The convergence of foreign direct investment and restructuring: Evidence from cross-border divestitures. Global Finance Journal. 7(1). 67–87. 5 indexed citations

10.

Owers, James E., et al.. (1995). DIVIDEND INITIATION ANNOUNCEMENT EFFECTS AND THE FIRM'S INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 22(4). 551–573. 23 indexed citations

11.

Ghosh, Chinmoy, James E. Owers, & Ronald C. Rogers. (1992). Proxy Contests: A Re‐examination of the Value of the Vote Hypothesis. Managerial Finance. 18(7/8). 3–18. 4 indexed citations

12.

Owers, James E., et al.. (1992). Wealth Reduction in White Knight Bids. Financial Management. 21(3). 48–48. 28 indexed citations

13.

Lubatkin, Michael, Kae H. Chung, Ronald C. Rogers, & James E. Owers. (1989). Stockholder Reactions to CEO Changes in Large Corporations. Academy of Management Journal. 32(1). 47–68. 12 indexed citations

14.

Chung, Kae H., Michael Lubatkin, Ronald C. Rogers, & James E. Owers. (1987). Do Insiders Make Better CEOs than. 2 indexed citations

15.

Hite, Gailen L., James E. Owers, & Ronald C. Rogers. (1987). The market for interfirm asset sales. Journal of Financial Economics. 18(2). 229–252. 263 indexed citations

16.

Owers, James E. & Ronald C. Rogers. (1984). CAPITAL STRUCTURE CHANGES AND FIRM VALUE: THE CASE OF EQUITY FOR DEBT SWAPS. Financial Review. 19(3). 103–103. 1 indexed citations

17.

Rogers, Ronald C. & James E. Owers. (1984). THE IMPACT OF VALUE LINE SPECIAL SITUATION RECOMMENDATIONS ON STOCK PRICES. Financial Review. 19(2). 195–207. 5 indexed citations

18.

Hite, Gailen L. & James E. Owers. (1983). Security price reactions around corporate spin-off announcements. Journal of Financial Economics. 12(4). 409–436. 356 indexed citations

19.

Owers, James E.. (1982). Voluntary divestiture and security valuation : evidence and issues. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network). 2 indexed citations

20.

Owers, James E.. (1975). "Limitation of Entry in the United States Fishing Industry": A Comment. Land Economics. 51(2). 177–177. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact