J. R. Scaife
- Animal Science and Zoology top 1%
- Analytical Chemistry top 1%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Daniel CozzolinoIan MurrayH. GalbraithRachel A. PatersonW. MichieS. W. B. EwenAraceli Pinelli‐SaavedraG. A. Garton
- Topics
- Meat and Animal Product Quality (15 papers)Animal Nutrition and Physiology (12 papers)Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMexicoUruguay
In The Last Decade
J. R. Scaife
48 papers receiving 840 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Animal Science and Zoology 441
- Analytical Chemistry 283
- Agronomy and Crop Science 156
- Nutrition and Dietetics 124
- Molecular Biology 120
Countries citing papers authored by J. R. Scaife
This map shows the geographic impact of J. R. Scaife's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. R. Scaife with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. R. Scaife more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. R. Scaife
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. R. Scaife. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. R. Scaife. The network helps show where J. R. Scaife may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. R. Scaife
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. R. Scaife. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. R. Scaife based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. R. Scaife. J. R. Scaife is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The effect of pre-treatment or supplementation of rapeseed meal and full-fat rapeseed diets with enzymes on broiler performance. | 1 |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 124 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 58 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 206. Comparison of the in vitro rumen fermentation of forage legumes Sesbania rostrata and Sesbania aculeata. pp. 471. School of Agriculture, UK and Rowett Research Insitute, UK. | 1 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 130 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About J. R. Scaife
J. R. Scaife is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Equine, having authored 54 papers that have together received 919 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (15 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (12 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (441 citations), Analytical Chemistry (283 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (156 citations). J. R. Scaife has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Uruguay. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Cozzolino, Ian Murray, H. Galbraith, Rachel A. Paterson, W. Michie, S. W. B. Ewen, Araceli Pinelli‐Saavedra, G. A. Garton, Klaus W.J. Wahle and L.A. Sinclair. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Biochemical Journal and British Journal Of Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.