Philip N. Jones
- Sociology and Political Science
- Urban Studies top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Epidemiology
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Richard B. CappsN. Gül Özcan-TaşkınJ. E. WilliamsDavid PinderBirender BalainKarina T. WrightSally RobertsRoei Davidson
- Topics
- Urbanization and City Planning (9 papers)Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (4 papers)Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwitzerlandSingapore
In The Last Decade
Philip N. Jones
34 papers receiving 228 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Sociology and Political Science 75
- Urban Studies 49
- Economics and Econometrics 39
- Epidemiology 38
- Political Science and International Relations 33
Countries citing papers authored by Philip N. Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip N. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip N. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip N. Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip N. Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip N. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip N. Jones. The network helps show where Philip N. Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip N. Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip N. Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip N. Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip N. Jones. Philip N. Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | De-industrialisation and new industrialisation in Britain and Germany | 5 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Some aspects of immigration into the Glamorgan coalfield between 1881 and 1911 | 2 |
| 20 | 17 |
About Philip N. Jones
Philip N. Jones is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Microbiology and Anthropology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urbanization and City Planning (9 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (4 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (49 citations), Hepatology (21 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (5 citations). Philip N. Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Richard B. Capps, N. Gül Özcan-Taşkın, J. E. Williams, David Pinder, Birender Balain, Karina T. Wright, Sally Roberts, Roei Davidson, Christopher D. Buckley and Jennifer L. Marshall. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and Urban Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.