D. Michael Risinger
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Law top 0.5%
- Genetics
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael J. SaksWilliam C. ThompsonRobert RosenthalMark DenbeauxDavid H. KayeGlenn LangenburgItiel E. DrorJonathan J. Koehler
- Topics
- Jury Decision Making Processes (13 papers)Criminal Law and Evidence (11 papers)Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (8 papers)
- Cited by
- LawPharmacySocial Psychology
- Journals
- The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-)The Yale Law JournalUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaCanada
In The Last Decade
D. Michael Risinger
42 papers receiving 676 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Social Psychology 213
- Law 190
- Genetics 142
- Sociology and Political Science 140
- Information Systems 108
Countries citing papers authored by D. Michael Risinger
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Michael Risinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Michael Risinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Michael Risinger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. Michael Risinger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Michael Risinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Michael Risinger. The network helps show where D. Michael Risinger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Michael Risinger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Michael Risinger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Michael Risinger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Michael Risinger. D. Michael Risinger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Five Functions of Forensic Science and the Validation Issues They Raise: A Piece to Incite Discussion on Validation | 2 |
| 2 | The Science and Law Underlying Post-Conviction Challenges to Shaken Baby Syndrome Convictions: A Response to Professor Imwinkelried | 2 |
| 3 | Miscarriages of Justice: A Theoretical and Practical Overview | 1 |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | Innocence Is Different: Taking Innocence into Account in Reforming Criminal Procedure | 5 |
| 6 | Bayes Wars Redivivus - An Exchange | 9 |
| 7 | Inquiry, Relevance, Rules of Exclusion and Evidentiary Reform | 1 |
| 8 | Guilt vs. Guiltiness: Are the Right Rules for Trying Factual InnocenceInevitably the Wrong Rules for Trying Culpability? | 1 |
| 9 | INNOCENTS CONVICTED: AN EMPIRICALLY JUSTIFIED FACTUAL WRONGFUL CONVICTION RATE | 48 |
| 10 | Goodbye to All That, or, A Fool's Errand, By One of the Fools: How I Stopped Worrying About Court Responses to Handwriting Identification (and 'Forensic Science' in General) and Learned to Love Misinterpretations of Kumho Tire v. Carmichael | 4 |
| 11 | The Reliability of Latent Print Individualization: Brief of Amici Curiae Submitted on Behalf of Scientists and Scholars by the New England Innocence Project, Commonwealth v. Patterson | 2 |
| 12 | Kumho Tire and Expert Reliability: How the Question You Ask Gives the Answer You Get | 10 |
| 13 | Unsafe Verdicts: The Need for Reformed Standards for the Trial and Review of Factual Innocence Claims | 8 |
| 14 | A House With No Foundation | 10 |
| 15 | Unsafe Verdicts: The Need for Reformed Standands for the Trial and Review of Factual Innocence Claims | 3 |
| 16 | Three Card Monte, Monty Hall, Modus Operandi and 'Offender Profiling': Some Lessons of Modern Cognitive Science for the Law of Evidence | 14 |
| 17 | Defining the."Task at Hand":Non-Science Forensic Science AfterKumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael | 4 |
| 18 | Preliminary Thoughts on a Functional Taxonomy of Expertise for the Post-Kumho World | 6 |
| 19 | Defining the 'Task at Hand': Non-Science Forensic Science after Kumho Tire V. Carmichael | 5 |
| 20 | John Henry Wigmore, Johnny Lynn Old Chief, and "Legitimate Moral Force" - Keeping the Courtroom Safe for Heartstrings and Gore | 3 |
About D. Michael Risinger
D. Michael Risinger is a scholar working on Law, General Decision Sciences and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 43 papers that have together received 762 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jury Decision Making Processes (13 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (11 papers) and Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (190 citations), Pharmacy (61 citations) and Social Psychology (213 citations). D. Michael Risinger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Saks, William C. Thompson, Robert Rosenthal, Mark Denbeaux, David H. Kaye, Glenn Langenburg, Itiel E. Dror, Jonathan J. Koehler, Norah Rudin and David A. Stoney. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), The Yale Law Journal and University of Pennsylvania Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.