Jennifer L. Mnookin

1.2k total citations
34 papers, 573 citations indexed

About

Jennifer L. Mnookin is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jennifer L. Mnookin has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 573 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Law, 6 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Jennifer L. Mnookin's work include Criminal Law and Evidence (10 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (7 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (6 papers). Jennifer L. Mnookin is often cited by papers focused on Criminal Law and Evidence (10 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (7 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (6 papers). Jennifer L. Mnookin collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Philippines. Jennifer L. Mnookin's co-authors include Itiel E. Dror, Jonathan J. Koehler, Barry A.J. Fisher, D. Michael Risinger, David H. Kaye, Norah Rudin, Keith Inman, David A. Stoney, Simon A. Cole and Glenn Langenburg and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.

In The Last Decade

Jennifer L. Mnookin

30 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jennifer L. Mnookin United States	13	146	131	125	87	81	34	573
D. Michael Risinger United States	12	142 1.0×	190 1.5×	140 1.1×	73 0.8×	213 2.6×	43	762
Gary Edmond Australia	19	126 0.9×	373 2.8×	229 1.8×	39 0.4×	154 1.9×	107	1.1k
Keith Inman United States	13	261 1.8×	45 0.3×	51 0.4×	46 0.5×	43 0.5×	22	554
Glenn Langenburg United States	14	287 2.0×	48 0.4×	42 0.3×	206 2.4×	156 1.9×	23	624
C.J. de Poot Netherlands	18	192 1.3×	46 0.4×	443 3.5×	76 0.9×	121 1.5×	70	891
Peter J. Neufeld United States	8	75 0.5×	118 0.9×	159 1.3×	23 0.3×	217 2.7×	13	540
Edward K. Cheng United States	8	41 0.3×	88 0.7×	77 0.6×	21 0.2×	77 1.0×	28	382
Loene M. Howes Australia	15	42 0.3×	46 0.4×	130 1.0×	12 0.1×	104 1.3×	40	438
Dana Wilson‐Kovacs United Kingdom	11	33 0.2×	18 0.1×	102 0.8×	42 0.5×	12 0.1×	24	328
Anthony A. Barrett Canada	11	58 0.4×	11 0.1×	27 0.2×	20 0.2×	14 0.2×	59	457

Countries citing papers authored by Jennifer L. Mnookin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jennifer L. Mnookin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jennifer L. Mnookin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jennifer L. Mnookin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jennifer L. Mnookin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jennifer L. Mnookin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jennifer L. Mnookin. The network helps show where Jennifer L. Mnookin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jennifer L. Mnookin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jennifer L. Mnookin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jennifer L. Mnookin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jennifer L. Mnookin. Jennifer L. Mnookin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Mnookin, Jennifer L., et al.. (2023). On the ontology and epistemology of visual legal evidence: Interview with Jennifer L. Mnookin. First Monday. 1 indexed citations

Koehler, Jonathan J., Jennifer L. Mnookin, & Michael J. Saks. (2023). The scientific reinvention of forensic science.

Koehler, Jonathan J., Jennifer L. Mnookin, & Michael J. Saks. (2023). The scientific reinvention of forensic science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120(41). e2301840120–e2301840120. 10 indexed citations

Mnookin, Jennifer L.. (2015). Repeat Play Evidence: Jack Weinstein, “Pedagogical Devices,” Technology, and Evidence. The De Paul law review. 64(2). 15. 1 indexed citations

Mnookin, Jennifer L.. (2015). Constructing Evidence and Educating Juries: The Case for Modular, Made-in-Advance Expert Evidence about Eyewitness Identifications and False Confessions. Texas law review. 93(7). 1811. 4 indexed citations

Kellman, Philip J., Jennifer L. Mnookin, Gennady Erlikhman, et al.. (2014). Forensic Comparison and Matching of Fingerprints: Using Quantitative Image Measures for Estimating Error Rates through Understanding and Predicting Difficulty. PLoS ONE. 9(5). e94617–e94617. 28 indexed citations

Mnookin, Jennifer L.. (2013). Atomism, Holism, and the Judicial Assessment of Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Mnookin, Jennifer L.. (2013). Semi-Legibility and Visual Evidence: An Initial Exploration. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Kaye, David H. & Jennifer L. Mnookin. (2013). Confronting Science: Expert Evidence and the Confrontation Clause.

10.

Mnookin, Jennifer L.. (2010). The Courts, the NAS, and the Future of Forensic Science. Brooklyn law review. 75(4). 10. 16 indexed citations

11.

Mnookin, Jennifer L.. (2008). Expert Evidence, Partisanship and Epistemic Competence. Brooklyn law review. 73(3). 7. 16 indexed citations

12.

Mnookin, Jennifer L.. (2007). Idealizing Science and Demonizing Experts: An Intellectual History of Expert Evidence. Villanova law review. 52(4). 763. 3 indexed citations

13.

Mnookin, Jennifer L.. (2007). The validity of latent fingerprint identification: confessions of a fingerprinting moderate. Law Probability and Risk. 7(2). 127–141. 2 indexed citations

14.

Mnookin, Jennifer L.. (2007). People V. Castro: Challenging the Forensic Use of DNA Evidence. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 3(1). 3 indexed citations

15.

Siegel, David M., Simon A. Cole, David L. Faigman, et al.. (2006). The Reliability of Latent Print Individualization: Brief of Amici Curiae Submitted on Behalf of Scientists and Scholars by the New England Innocence Project, Commonwealth v. Patterson. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

16.

Siegel, David M., Simon A. Cole, David L. Faigman, et al.. (2006). The Reliability of Latent Print Individualization Brief of Amici Curiae Submitted on Behalf of Scientists and Scholars by the New England Innocence Project, Commonwealth v. Patterson. 42(1). 1 indexed citations

17.

Mnookin, Jennifer L.. (2005). Reproducing a Trial: Evidence and Its Assessment in Paradise Lost. Stanford University Press eBooks. 153–200. 2 indexed citations

18.

Gross, Samuel R. & Jennifer L. Mnookin. (2003). Expert Information and Expert Evidence: A Preliminary Taxonomy. Seton Hall Law Review. 34(1). 7. 6 indexed citations

19.

Mnookin, Jennifer L., et al.. (2001). Theaters of Proof: Visual Evidence and the Law in Call Northside 777. SSRN Electronic Journal. 8 indexed citations

20.

Mnookin, Jennifer L.. (1998). The Image of Truth: Photographic Evidence and the Power of Analogy. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10(1). 1. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact