Irena Iskra‐Golec
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Agnieszka Golec de ZavalaAleksandra CichockaLawrence SmithPhilip BohleJanet L. Barnes-FarrellLen SmithLúcia RotenbergAnna Arlinghaus
- Topics
- Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (9 papers)Workplace Health and Well-being (8 papers)Circadian rhythm and melatonin (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- PolandUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Irena Iskra‐Golec
19 papers receiving 491 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- General Health Professions 171
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 154
- Sociology and Political Science 150
- Social Psychology 143
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 75
Countries citing papers authored by Irena Iskra‐Golec
This map shows the geographic impact of Irena Iskra‐Golec's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irena Iskra‐Golec with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irena Iskra‐Golec more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Irena Iskra‐Golec
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Irena Iskra‐Golec. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Irena Iskra‐Golec. The network helps show where Irena Iskra‐Golec may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Irena Iskra‐Golec
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Irena Iskra‐Golec. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Irena Iskra‐Golec based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Irena Iskra‐Golec. Irena Iskra‐Golec is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 86 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 124 | |
| 9 | 49 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | The effect of a change in sleep-wakefulness timing, bright light and physical exercise interventions on 24-hour patterns of performance, mood and body temperature. | 5 |
| 17 | Ultradian rhythms in processing speed of laterally exposed words and pictures. | 4 |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Irena Iskra‐Golec
Irena Iskra‐Golec is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (9 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (8 papers) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (154 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (75 citations) and Social Psychology (143 citations). Irena Iskra‐Golec has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Agnieszka Golec de Zavala, Aleksandra Cichocka, Lawrence Smith, Philip Bohle, Janet L. Barnes-Farrell, Len Smith, Lúcia Rotenberg, Anna Arlinghaus, Nicole Jansen and Sarah M. Jay. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Ergonomics and Applied Ergonomics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.