Laura Smith

1.1k citations
64 papers · 653 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Laura Smith

54 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers

Laura Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Neurology 86
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 91
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 131
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 57
  • Sensory Systems 27
Replace Mohamed Sakel with:
Mohamed Sakel United Kingdom
Leslie K. Allison United States
Tal Krasovsky Israel
Jeanne Langan United States
Emilia Mikołajewska Poland
Anu Holm Finland
Thiru M. Annaswamy United States
Michael W. O’Dell United States
Paul Willems Netherlands
Mark R. Schmeler United States
Laura Smith relative to Mohamed Sakel United Kingdom Mohamed Sakel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.4×
Mohamed Sakel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laura Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Smith. The network helps show where Laura Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Laura Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laura Smith Line = papers co-authored together Laura Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20255
2 20250
3 20240
4 20242
5 20241
6 20249
7 20241
8 20242
9 20236
10 202328
11 20221
12 20204
13 20204
14 20191
15
Assessing belief-attribution in adults with and without Autism Spectrum Disorders using a computerised false-belief task.
20181
16 20182
17 201717
18 201710
19 201642
20
Peer Tutors in a College Reading Laboratory: A Model That Works.
19873

About Laura Smith

Laura Smith is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Occupational Therapy and General Health Professions, having authored 64 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (12 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (7 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (7 papers), Power Line Communications and Noise (6 papers), Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements (6 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (4 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (86 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (91 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (131 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (57 citations) and Sensory Systems (27 citations). Laura Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paul Harper, Vincent Knight, Bara Alsalaheen, Amy M. Yorke, Rachel Shaw, Youjung Lee, David T. Wilkinson, Heather J. Ferguson, Elisabeth E.F. Bradford and Edward J. Kane. Their work appears in journals such as Health Expectations, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026