Ira Nichols-Barrer

529 total citations
19 papers, 203 citations indexed

About

Ira Nichols-Barrer is a scholar working on Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Ira Nichols-Barrer has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 203 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Education, 4 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 2 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Ira Nichols-Barrer's work include School Choice and Performance (9 papers), Education Systems and Policy (5 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (4 papers). Ira Nichols-Barrer is often cited by papers focused on School Choice and Performance (9 papers), Education Systems and Policy (5 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (4 papers). Ira Nichols-Barrer collaborates with scholars based in United States. Ira Nichols-Barrer's co-authors include Philip Gleason, Brian Gill, Christina Clark Tuttle, Alexandra Resch, Barbara Devaney, Ted Joyce, Silvie Colman, Jesse Chandler, Steven Glazerman and Mariel M. Finucane and has published in prestigious journals such as World Development, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis and Evaluation Review.

In The Last Decade

Ira Nichols-Barrer

18 papers receiving 172 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ira Nichols-Barrer United States 9 143 44 21 16 16 19 203
Thomas van Huizen Netherlands 7 145 1.0× 59 1.3× 17 0.8× 13 0.8× 35 2.2× 15 231
David Honeyman United States 7 79 0.6× 33 0.8× 13 0.6× 22 1.4× 5 0.3× 20 169
James C. Palmer United States 9 135 0.9× 24 0.5× 39 1.9× 34 2.1× 18 1.1× 46 227
Clare Halloran United States 5 104 0.7× 47 1.1× 18 0.9× 8 0.5× 10 0.6× 6 192
Joshua Haimson 9 126 0.9× 23 0.5× 22 1.0× 15 0.9× 48 3.0× 22 204
Heather Sandstrom United States 8 113 0.8× 76 1.7× 49 2.3× 8 0.5× 15 0.9× 11 206
Judith Delaney Ireland 9 73 0.5× 45 1.0× 26 1.2× 12 0.8× 46 2.9× 24 203
Laura Bellows United States 10 149 1.0× 68 1.5× 65 3.1× 8 0.5× 14 0.9× 20 261
Fred Powell Ireland 10 61 0.4× 65 1.5× 49 2.3× 31 1.9× 18 1.1× 35 182
Jeffrey Capizzano United States 7 98 0.7× 57 1.3× 23 1.1× 9 0.6× 53 3.3× 14 165

Countries citing papers authored by Ira Nichols-Barrer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ira Nichols-Barrer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ira Nichols-Barrer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ira Nichols-Barrer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ira Nichols-Barrer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ira Nichols-Barrer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ira Nichols-Barrer. The network helps show where Ira Nichols-Barrer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ira Nichols-Barrer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ira Nichols-Barrer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ira Nichols-Barrer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ira Nichols-Barrer. Ira Nichols-Barrer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Nichols-Barrer, Ira, et al.. (2022). The Impacts on College Enrollment of a Charter Network Serving Disadvantaged Students: Evidence From KIPP Middle School Lotteries. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. 15(4). 780–798. 1 indexed citations
2.
Glazerman, Steven, et al.. (2020). The Choice Architecture of School Choice Websites. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. 13(2). 322–350. 15 indexed citations
3.
Nichols-Barrer, Ira, et al.. (2019). Long-Term Impacts of KIPP Middle Schools on College Enrollment and Early College Persistence.. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 7 indexed citations
4.
Nichols-Barrer, Ira, et al.. (2019). Beyond “Treatment Versus Control”: How Bayesian Analysis Makes Factorial Experiments Feasible in Education Research. Evaluation Review. 44(4). 238–261. 5 indexed citations
5.
Glazerman, Steven, et al.. (2018). Presenting School Choice Information to Parents: An Evidence-Based Guide. NCEE 2019-4003.. 1 indexed citations
6.
Nichols-Barrer, Ira, et al.. (2018). Bridging the information gap between citizens and local governments: Evidence from a civic participation strengthening program in Rwanda. World Development. 108. 145–156. 19 indexed citations
7.
Nichols-Barrer, Ira, et al.. (2016). Testing College Readiness.. Education next. 16(3). 70–76. 1 indexed citations
8.
Tuttle, Christina Clark, et al.. (2015). Understanding the Effect of KIPP as It Scales: Volume I, Impacts on Achievement and Other Outcomes. Final Report of KIPP's "Investing in Innovation Grant Evaluation".. Mathematica Policy Research Reports. 5 indexed citations
9.
Nichols-Barrer, Ira, Philip Gleason, Brian Gill, & Christina Clark Tuttle. (2015). Student Selection, Attrition, and Replacement in KIPP Middle Schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 38(1). 5–20. 18 indexed citations
10.
Nichols-Barrer, Ira, Brian Gill, Philip Gleason, & Christina Clark Tuttle. (2014). Does Student Attrition Explain KIPP's Success?. Education next. 14(4). 62–70. 3 indexed citations
11.
Furgeson, Joshua, et al.. (2014). KIPP Leadership Practices through 2010-2011. Technical Report.. Mathematica Policy Research Reports. 1 indexed citations
12.
Tuttle, Christina Clark, et al.. (2013). KIPP Middle Schools: Impacts on Achievement and Other Outcomes. Mathematica Policy Research Reports. 43 indexed citations
13.
Tuttle, Christina Clark, et al.. (2013). KIPP Middle Schools: Impacts on Achievement and Other Outcomes. Final Report.. Mathematica Policy Research Reports. 21 indexed citations
14.
Gleason, Philip, et al.. (2013). Do KIPP Schools Boost Student Achievement?. Education Finance and Policy. 9(1). 36–58. 18 indexed citations
15.
Colman, Silvie, et al.. (2012). Effects of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC): A Review of Recent Research (Summary). RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 18 indexed citations
16.
Furgeson, Joshua, Brian Gill, Joshua Haimson, et al.. (2012). Charter-School Management Organizations: Diverse Strategies and Diverse Student Impacts. Updated Edition.. Mathematica Policy Research Reports. 5 indexed citations
17.
Furgeson, Joshua, Brian Gill, Joshua Haimson, et al.. (2011). The National Study of Charter Management Organization (CMO) Effectiveness. Charter-School Management Organizations: Diverse Strategies and Diverse Student Impacts.. Mathematica Policy Research Reports. 8 indexed citations
18.
Tuttle, Christina Clark, et al.. (2010). Supplemental Analytic Sample Equivalence Tables for Student Characteristics and Achievement in 22 KIPP Middle Schools: A Report from the National Evaluation of KIPP Middle Schools.. Mathematica Policy Research Reports. 1 indexed citations
19.
Tuttle, Christina Clark, et al.. (2010). Student Characteristics and Achievement in 22 KIPP Middle Schools: Final Report.. Mathematica Policy Research Reports. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026