Inger Bergom

544 total citations
22 papers, 312 citations indexed

About

Inger Bergom is a scholar working on Education, Political Science and International Relations and Media Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, Inger Bergom has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 312 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Education, 4 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 4 papers in Media Technology. Recurrent topics in Inger Bergom's work include Higher Education Research Studies (6 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers) and Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (4 papers). Inger Bergom is often cited by papers focused on Higher Education Research Studies (6 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (5 papers) and Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (4 papers). Inger Bergom collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Inger Bergom's co-authors include Lisa R. Lattuca, David S. Knight, David B. Knight, Mary C. Wright, Carol Hollenshead, Jean Waltman, Louise August, Hyun Kyoung Ro, Cynthia Finelli and Michael Brooks and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Higher Education, Journal of Engineering Education and Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education.

In The Last Decade

Inger Bergom

19 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Inger Bergom United States 10 189 60 51 43 35 22 312
Sean Gehrke United States 11 253 1.3× 62 1.0× 33 0.6× 32 0.7× 39 1.1× 17 403
Terrel L. Rhodes United States 7 294 1.6× 49 0.8× 14 0.3× 19 0.4× 22 0.6× 24 388
Lillian Y. Y. Luk Hong Kong 11 295 1.6× 120 2.0× 12 0.2× 25 0.6× 24 0.7× 15 390
Carol Geary Schneider United States 11 327 1.7× 20 0.3× 82 1.6× 19 0.4× 34 1.0× 48 472
Jeff Jawitz South Africa 12 346 1.8× 92 1.5× 18 0.4× 15 0.3× 33 0.9× 27 492
David E. Drew United States 11 145 0.8× 22 0.4× 29 0.6× 23 0.5× 20 0.6× 52 311
Robert Domingo United States 4 282 1.5× 47 0.8× 12 0.2× 15 0.3× 73 2.1× 6 389
Marian Fitzmaurice Ireland 8 292 1.5× 33 0.6× 18 0.4× 12 0.3× 23 0.7× 10 393
Nan L. Maxwell United States 9 460 2.4× 52 0.9× 13 0.3× 39 0.9× 20 0.6× 18 566
Matilde Sánchez‐Peña United States 8 141 0.7× 65 1.1× 18 0.4× 19 0.4× 48 1.4× 29 352

Countries citing papers authored by Inger Bergom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inger Bergom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inger Bergom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inger Bergom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inger Bergom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inger Bergom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inger Bergom. The network helps show where Inger Bergom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inger Bergom

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inger Bergom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inger Bergom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inger Bergom. Inger Bergom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bergom, Inger, et al.. (2025). Community Profile Data Dashboards of AAU Institutions: Content, Design, and Definitions. Innovative Higher Education. 50(5). 1747–1763.
2.
Ro, Hyun Kyoung, Frank Fernandez, & Inger Bergom. (2022). How can STEM disciplines support political engagement? Examining student characteristics and college experiences. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 30. 1 indexed citations
3.
Ganago, Alexander, et al.. (2020). Using A Website And Wiki As A Support Tool For Teaching Assistants. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 15.1317.1–15.1317.11.
4.
Lattuca, Lisa R., David B. Knight, & Inger Bergom. (2020). Developing a Measure of Interdisciplinary Competence for Engineers. 25.415.1–25.415.19. 26 indexed citations
5.
Garlick, Jonathan A., et al.. (2020). Design and Impact of an Undergraduate Civic Science Course. Journal of College Science Teaching. 49(4). 41–49. 1 indexed citations
6.
Knight, David B., Inger Bergom, Brian A. Burt, & Lisa R. Lattuca. (2020). Multiple Starting Lines: Pre-college Characteristics of Community College and Four-year Institution Engineering Students. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 24.926.1–24.926.23. 3 indexed citations
7.
Bergom, Inger, et al.. (2019). Voter Participation, Socioeconomic Status, and Institutional Contexts in Higher Education. Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education. 42(4). 1665–1688. 7 indexed citations
8.
Fernandez, Frank, et al.. (2019). Is campus diversity related to Latinx student voter turnout in presidential elections?. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. 13(3). 195–204. 1 indexed citations
9.
Ro, Hyun Kyoung, et al.. (2019). Political Engagement among Undergraduate Women of Color. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice. 56(5). 564–581. 1 indexed citations
10.
Wright, Mary C., et al.. (2017). Decreased class size, increased active learning? Intended and enacted teaching strategies in smaller classes. Active Learning in Higher Education. 20(1). 51–62. 40 indexed citations
11.
Lattuca, Lisa R., Inger Bergom, & David B. Knight. (2014). Professional Development, Departmental Contexts, and Use of Instructional Strategies. Journal of Engineering Education. 103(4). 549–572. 36 indexed citations
12.
Lattuca, Lisa R., David S. Knight, & Inger Bergom. (2013). Developing a measure of interdisciplinary competence. International journal of engineering education. 29(3). 726–739. 63 indexed citations
13.
Waltman, Jean, et al.. (2012). Factors Contributing to Job Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction among Non-Tenure-Track Faculty. The Journal of Higher Education. 83(3). 411–434. 15 indexed citations
14.
Waltman, Jean, et al.. (2012). Factors Contributing to Job Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction among Non-Tenure-Track Faculty. The Journal of Higher Education. 83(3). 411–434. 55 indexed citations
15.
Wright, Mary C., Inger Bergom, & Michael Brooks. (2011). The Role of Teaching Assistants in Student-Centered Learning: Benefits, Costs, and Negotiations. Innovative Higher Education. 36(5). 331–342. 10 indexed citations
16.
Wright, Mary C., et al.. (2011). Facilitating the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at a Research University. Change The Magazine of Higher Learning. 43(2). 50–56. 10 indexed citations
17.
Bergom, Inger, et al.. (2011). Promoting College Student Development through Collaborative Learning: A Case Study of Hevruta. About Campus Enriching the Student Learning Experience. 15(6). 19–25. 8 indexed citations
18.
Finelli, Cynthia, Inger Bergom, & Vilma Mesa. (2011). Student Teams in the Engineering Classroom and Beyond: Setting up Students for Success. CRLT Occasional Paper No. 29.. 12 indexed citations
19.
Zhu, Erping, et al.. (2010). Assessing and Meeting TAs' Instructional Technology Training Needs: Research and Practice. ˜The œjournal of faculty development. 24(3). 37.
20.
Bergom, Inger, Jean Waltman, Louise August, & Carol Hollenshead. (2010). Academic Researchers Speak. Change The Magazine of Higher Learning. 42(2). 45–49. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026