Ines Stolpe

618 citations
23 papers · 403 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Ines Stolpe

23 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Ines Stolpe
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Political Science and International Relations 132
  • Demography 63
  • Education 137
  • Condensed Matter Physics 46
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 51
Replace C. P. Hays with:
C. P. Hays United States
David Neilson New Zealand
И. Адам Belgium
Hira Amin Qatar
Geo Saura Spain
György Molnár Hungary
Alex Thomson United States
María Balarin Peru
A. M. Prokhorov Russia
Ernest A. Lynton United States
Ines Stolpe relative to C. P. Hays United States C. P. Hays's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
C. P. Hays · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Stolpe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Stolpe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Stolpe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Stolpe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Stolpe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Stolpe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Stolpe. The network helps show where Ines Stolpe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Stolpe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Stolpe Line = papers co-authored together Ines Stolpe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Educational Import: Local Encounters with Global Forces in Mongolia
200684
2 199981
3 200678
4 200430
5 199720
6 200114
7 199811
8 200511
9 200110
10 20169
11 20017
12 20016
13 19986
14 20016
15 19985
16 19985
17 20085
18 19974
19 20004
20 20012

About Ines Stolpe

Ines Stolpe is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Aerospace Engineering and Education, having authored 23 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (8 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (4 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (4 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (3 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (3 papers) and Religious Education and Schools (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (132 citations), Demography (63 citations), Education (137 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (46 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (51 citations). Ines Stolpe has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Gita Steiner‐Khamsi, M. von Ortenberg, O. Portugall, Holger Müller, M. Barczewski, A. Kirste, В.В. Платонов, O.M. Tatsenko, N. P. Kolmakova and F. Herlach. Their work appears in journals such as Physica B Condensed Matter, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Comparative Education and Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact