Citations per year, relative to Idès Nicaise Idès Nicaise (= 1×)
peers
Claire Crawford
Countries citing papers authored by Idès Nicaise
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Idès Nicaise's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Idès Nicaise with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Idès Nicaise more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Idès Nicaise. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Idès Nicaise. The network helps show where Idès Nicaise may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Idès Nicaise
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Idès Nicaise.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Idès Nicaise based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Idès Nicaise. Idès Nicaise is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Plantenga, Janneke, et al.. (2015). The socio-economic dimension of early childhood education and care in Europe. Lirias (KU Leuven).2 indexed citations
4.
Lavrijsen, Jeroen, et al.. (2014). The Flemish education system in comparative perspective. A re-assessment of educational regime typologies.4 indexed citations
5.
Nicaise, Idès, et al.. (2009). The acculturation orientations of Muslim primary school children attending Flemish schools. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
6.
Nicaise, Idès, et al.. (2008). Werk- en welzijnstrajecten op maat: het kan beter. Lirias (KU Leuven). 18(2). 84–88.
7.
Nicaise, Idès. (2008). Gelijke kansen op school: wie wordt er slechter van?.1 indexed citations
8.
Nicaise, Idès, et al.. (2004). Longitudinaal onderzoek in het basisonderwijs. Oudervragenlijst schooljaar 2002-2003 (LOA-rapport nr. 22). Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
9.
Nicaise, Idès, et al.. (2004). De leerplicht tot achttien als armoedepreventie: een balans na twintig jaar. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
10.
Nicaise, Idès, et al.. (2004). Naar een brede school in Vlaanderen. 35(2). 99–108.3 indexed citations
11.
Nicaise, Idès, et al.. (2004). De leerplichtverlenging, twintig jaar later. Inzichten en vragen vanuit het onderzoeksveld. Lirias (KU Leuven). 457–471.1 indexed citations
Nicaise, Idès. (2001). Onderwijs en sociale achterstelling: opnieuw ontwaken uit de al te mooie wensdroom?. 383–392.1 indexed citations
14.
Nicaise, Idès, et al.. (2000). Uittreders subsidiëren: een rationele optie? Effectiviteit van maatregelen tot inkrimping van het arbeidsaanbod. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
Heylen, Freddy, et al.. (1998). Leven na de dop: een onderzoek naar de haalbaarheid en effectiviteit van opleidings- en werkervaringsgaranties voor langdurig werklozen in Vlaanderen. Lirias (KU Leuven).2 indexed citations
Nicaise, Idès, et al.. (1997). Koopjes op de arbeidsmarkt. De micro-economische effectiviteit van RSZ-bijdrageverminderingen bij tewerkstelling van risicogroepen in België. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
19.
Nicaise, Idès, et al.. (1995). De TOK-projecten en hun cursisten, drie jaar later. 86(3). 285–288.3 indexed citations
20.
Nicaise, Idès, et al.. (1995). Het zwaard van Damocles : arme gezinnen over de bijzondere jeugdbijstand.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.