Ian Reader

2.0k citations
80 papers · 853 indexed · h-index 14

Ian Reader

62 papers receiving 658 citations

Peers

Ian Reader
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Geography, Planning and Development 306
  • Cultural Studies 193
  • Philosophy 150
  • Sociology and Political Science 589
  • Anthropology 90
Replace Thomas A. Tweed with:
Thomas A. Tweed United States
Robert A. Orsi Brazil
Jeanne Favret-Saada France
Laurel Kendall United States
Jill Dubisch United States
Diana L. Eck United States
Kalliopi Nikolopoulou United States
Stef Craps Belgium
Geneviève Zubrzycki United States
Susan Harding United States
Ian Reader relative to Thomas A. Tweed United States Thomas A. Tweed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Thomas A. Tweed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Reader

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Reader's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Reader with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Reader more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Reader

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Reader. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Reader. The network helps show where Ian Reader may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Reader, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Reader Line = papers co-authored together Ian Reader links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 20231
3 20225
4
Problematic conceptions and critical developments: the construction and relevance of 'religion' and religious studies in Japan
20161
5 201510
6
Impact and ramifications : the aftermath of the Aum Affair in the Japanese religious context
20122
7
Dichotomies, Contested Terms and Contemporary Issues in the Study of Religion
20041
8 200227
9 200217
10 200214
11 20010
12 20017
13 200012
14 200013
15 20003
16 19960
17
A Poisonous Cocktail? Aum Shinrikyo's Path to Violence
199610
18 19920
19 19890
20 19894

About Ian Reader

Ian Reader is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Geography, Planning and Development, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Religious studies, having authored 80 papers that have together received 853 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (44 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (19 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (17 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (16 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (13 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (6 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (5 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (306 citations), Cultural Studies (193 citations), Philosophy (150 citations), Sociology and Political Science (589 citations) and Anthropology (90 citations). Ian Reader has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Tony Walter, George J. Tanabe, Richard Fox Young, Bardwell L. Smith, Richard A. Gardner, Robert Jay Lifton, Robert J. Smith, Lorne L. Dawson, Eileen Barker and Thomas Robbins. Their work appears in journals such as Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, Journal of Japanese Studies, Pacific Affairs and Japan Forum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026