Bardwell L. Smith

21 papers receiving 162 citations

Peers

Bardwell L. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Sociology and Political Science 164
  • Political Science and International Relations 97
  • Anthropology 67
  • Religious studies 57
  • Philosophy 36
Replace Holmes Welch with:
Holmes Welch United States
Martin Baumann Switzerland
S.N. Balagangadhara Belgium
John P. Ferguson United States
Nur Yalman United States
E. Brooks Holifield United States
André Droogers Algeria
Louise M. Burkhart United States
Lacey Baldwin Smith United States
Vittorio Lanternari Italy
Bardwell L. Smith relative to Holmes Welch United States Holmes Welch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Holmes Welch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bardwell L. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bardwell L. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bardwell L. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bardwell L. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bardwell L. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bardwell L. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bardwell L. Smith. The network helps show where Bardwell L. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bardwell L. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bardwell L. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bardwell L. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bardwell L. Smith. Bardwell L. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 0
3 57
4 2
5
Religion and Legitimation of Power in Sri Lanka
18
6 11
7 25
8 1
9 4
10
Campus-wide Governance at Carleton College: Its Performance and Prospects.
1
11 7
12 5
13
Religion and legitimation of power in Thailand, Laos, and Burma
63
14 2
15 4
16
Tradition and change in Theravada Buddhism : essays on Ceylon and Thailand in the 19th and 20th centuries
1
17 30
18
The tenure debate
7
19 8
20 3

About Bardwell L. Smith

Bardwell L. Smith is a scholar working on Religious studies, Political Science and International Relations and Cultural Studies, having authored 28 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (5 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (5 papers) and Japanese History and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (57 citations), Anthropology (67 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (97 citations). Bardwell L. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include George J. Tanabe, Ian Reader, Gananath Obeyesekere, Paul L. Younger, George Elison, Anthony F. C. Wallace, Murray L. Wax, Conrad Totman, John Perry and Wendy Doniger O’Flaherty. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The American Historical Review and Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026