Japan Forum

566 papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 566 papers published in Japan Forum in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Japan Forum usually cover Cultural Studies (322 papers), Sociology and Political Science (219 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (79 papers) specifically the topics of Japanese History and Culture (318 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (99 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Japan Forum are Philip Seaton, Takeshi Okamoto, Katja Valaskivi, Thomas Lamarre, Akiyoshi Yonezawa, Aaron L. Miller, Paul Waley, Penelope Francks, Osamu Saitô and Glenn D. Hook.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Japan Forum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Japan Forum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Japan Forum.

Countries where authors publish in Japan Forum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Japan Forum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Japan Forum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Japan Forum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025