George J. Tanabe
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Japanese History and Culture 14
- Asian American and Pacific Histories 2
- Religious studies top 10%
- Indian and Buddhist Studies 3
- Christian Theology and Mission 1
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 11
- Religion and Society Interactions 3
-
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 2
-
- Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Ian ReaderBardwell L. SmithJanet R. GoodwinPatrick O’NeillYoung Ho KimRichard BowringBernard FauréRoy Andrew Miller
- Journals
- Philosophy East and West (1 paper)Journal of the American Oriental Society (1 paper)Journal of Japanese Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
George J. Tanabe
16 papers receiving 77 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Cultural Studies 52
- Religious studies 12
- Health 17
- Sociology and Political Science 85
- Anthropology 18
Countries citing papers authored by George J. Tanabe
This map shows the geographic impact of George J. Tanabe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George J. Tanabe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George J. Tanabe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George J. Tanabe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George J. Tanabe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George J. Tanabe. The network helps show where George J. Tanabe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 12 scholars most cited alongside George J. Tanabe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 57 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 18 | Myoe Shonin (1173-1232) : tradition and reform in early Kamakura Buddhism | 1986 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1984 | 2 |
About George J. Tanabe
George J. Tanabe is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Religious studies and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 25 papers that have together received 124 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (14 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (11 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (3 papers), Asian American and Pacific Histories (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (1 paper) and Christian Theology and Mission (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (52 citations), Religious studies (12 citations) and Health (17 citations). George J. Tanabe has collaborated with scholars based in China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian Reader, Bardwell L. Smith, Janet R. Goodwin, Patrick O’Neill, Young Ho Kim, Richard Bowring, Bernard Fauré, Roy Andrew Miller, Burton Watson and Wm. Theodore de Bary. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, Journal of the American Oriental Society and Journal of Japanese Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.