Japanese Journal of Religious Studies

595 papers and 1.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 595 papers published in Japanese Journal of Religious Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Japanese Journal of Religious Studies usually cover Cultural Studies (388 papers), Sociology and Political Science (312 papers) and Philosophy (75 papers) specifically the topics of Japanese History and Culture (384 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (233 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Japanese Journal of Religious Studies are Victor Turner, Bryan Wilson, Ian Reader, Mark R. Mullins, Thomas Luckmann, Susumu Shimazono, Karel Dobbelaere, Harvey Cox, Helen Hardacre and Nam‐lin Hur.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Japanese Journal of Religious Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Japanese Journal of Religious Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Japanese Journal of Religious Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Japanese Journal of Religious Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Japanese Journal of Religious Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025