Ian M. Handley
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jessi L. SmithG. Daniel LassiterElizabeth R. BrownCorinne A. Moss‐RacusinAndrew L. GeersDolores AlbarracínKeith D. MarkmanAudrey K. Miller
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers)Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Personality and Social PsychologyJournal of Applied Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaDenmark
In The Last Decade
Ian M. Handley
28 papers receiving 750 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Social Psychology 275
- Sociology and Political Science 237
- Gender Studies 218
- Cognitive Neuroscience 167
- Applied Psychology 146
Countries citing papers authored by Ian M. Handley
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian M. Handley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian M. Handley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian M. Handley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian M. Handley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian M. Handley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian M. Handley. The network helps show where Ian M. Handley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian M. Handley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian M. Handley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian M. Handley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ian M. Handley. Ian M. Handley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 64 | |
| 8 | 163 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 63 | |
| 15 | Inferential and Perceptual Influences of Affective Expectations on Judgments of Experienced Affect | 1 |
| 16 | 59 | |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 54 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Ian M. Handley
Ian M. Handley is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 29 papers that have together received 810 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (146 citations), Gender Studies (218 citations) and General Decision Sciences (31 citations). Ian M. Handley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jessi L. Smith, G. Daniel Lassiter, Elizabeth R. Brown, Corinne A. Moss‐Racusin, Andrew L. Geers, Dolores Albarracín, Keith D. Markman, Audrey K. Miller, Paul E. Weiland and Kenji Noguchi. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Journal of Applied Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.