Hope Johnson

35 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

Hope Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Food Science 188
  • Business and International Management 14
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 52
  • Strategy and Management 69
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36
Replace Giovanni Peira with:
Giovanni Peira Italy
Ferne Edwards Australia
Manal Hamam Italy
Barbara Pancino Italy
Maria Raimondo Italy
Marco V. Sánchez United States
Marie Mourad France
Barbara Redlingshöfer France
Annalisa De Boni Italy
Alden C. Manchester United States
Hope Johnson relative to Giovanni Peira Italy Giovanni Peira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Giovanni Peira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hope Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hope Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hope Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hope Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hope Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hope Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hope Johnson. The network helps show where Hope Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hope Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hope Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Hope Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202079
2 202057
3 201537
4 202331
5 202018
6 201917
7 202217
8 202210
9 20247
10 20217
11 20227
12 20197
13 20227
14 20216
15 20246
16 20216
17 20225
18
A review of Single-use Plastic Waste Policy in 2018: What will 2019 hold in store?
20195
19 20185
20 20195

About Hope Johnson

Hope Johnson is a scholar working on Food Science, Ecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Plant Science and Strategy and Management, having authored 36 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (14 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (10 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (6 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (4 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers), Municipal Solid Waste Management (3 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (3 papers) and Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (188 citations), Business and International Management (14 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (52 citations), Strategy and Management (69 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (36 citations). Hope Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Carol Richards, Christine Parker, Nigel South, Reece Walters, Shoufeng Cao, Ayesha Tulloch, Rachel Carey, Fiona Haines, Katherine Sievert and Mark Lawrence. Their work appears in journals such as Agriculture and Human Values, Sustainable Production and Consumption, Food Research International, Agronomy and Polymer Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact