Hope Caton

566 total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 376 citations indexed

About

Hope Caton is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Hope Caton has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 376 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 3 papers in Education and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Hope Caton's work include Educational Games and Gamification (4 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (2 papers). Hope Caton is often cited by papers focused on Educational Games and Gamification (4 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (2 papers). Hope Caton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Hope Caton's co-authors include Carol Rivas, Elizabeth A. Edwards, Robert Walton, Liz Steed, Chris Griffiths, Jim Lumsden, Stephanie Taylor, Ratna Sohanpal, Marcus R. Munafò and Arulmani Thiyagarajan and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ Open, JMIR Serious Games and Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning.

In The Last Decade

Hope Caton

6 papers receiving 365 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Gamification for health promotion: systematic review of behaviour change techniques in smartphone apps

2016 303 citations Elizabeth A. Edwards, Jim Lumsden et al. BMJ Open profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Hope Caton United Kingdom	5	166	118	112	87	78	6	376
Arulmani Thiyagarajan India	6	187 1.1×	69 0.6×	108 1.0×	74 0.9×	71 0.9×	17	431
Anni Pakarinen Finland	9	81 0.5×	60 0.5×	51 0.5×	43 0.5×	41 0.5×	27	273
Tuomas Alahäivälä Finland	6	94 0.6×	73 0.6×	104 0.9×	68 0.8×	26 0.3×	8	275
Jessica Trail United States	5	112 0.7×	47 0.4×	113 1.0×	31 0.4×	51 0.7×	5	372
Sarim Siddiqui United Kingdom	8	91 0.5×	24 0.2×	98 0.9×	60 0.7×	73 0.9×	13	227
Ruth S. Contreras Spain	4	236 1.4×	26 0.2×	98 0.9×	48 0.6×	198 2.5×	16	437
Sarah Pila United States	7	99 0.6×	62 0.5×	69 0.6×	62 0.7×	17 0.2×	27	360
Yusuf Sherwani United Kingdom	5	85 0.5×	23 0.2×	96 0.9×	58 0.7×	73 0.9×	10	211
Ilea Sanders Australia	5	237 1.4×	21 0.2×	128 1.1×	71 0.8×	184 2.4×	5	392
Peggy Glider United States	9	101 0.6×	56 0.5×	84 0.8×	66 0.8×	36 0.5×	16	349

Countries citing papers authored by Hope Caton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hope Caton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hope Caton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hope Caton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hope Caton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hope Caton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hope Caton. The network helps show where Hope Caton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hope Caton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hope Caton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hope Caton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hope Caton. Hope Caton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Greenhill, D., et al.. (2020). Development and evaluation of an educational game to support pharmacy students. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 12(7). 786–803. 15 indexed citations

2.

Edwards, Elizabeth A., Hope Caton, Jim Lumsden, et al.. (2018). Creating a Theoretically Grounded, Gamified Health App: Lessons From Developing the Cigbreak Smoking Cessation Mobile Phone Game. JMIR Serious Games. 6(4). e10252–e10252. 25 indexed citations

3.

Edwards, Elizabeth A., Jim Lumsden, Carol Rivas, et al.. (2016). Gamification for health promotion: systematic review of behaviour change techniques in smartphone apps. BMJ Open. 6(10). e012447–e012447. 303 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Caton, Hope & D. Greenhill. (2014). Rewards and Penalties. International Journal of Game-Based Learning. 4(3). 1–12. 22 indexed citations

5.

Greenhill, D., et al.. (2013). The design and evaluation of a multiplayer serious game for pharmacy students. Research Repository (Kingston University London). 8 indexed citations

6.

Greenhill, D., et al.. (2013). Evaluation of pharmacy students perceptions regarding the use of games to support their learning. Research Repository (Kingston University London). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact