Nada Philip

71 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Nada Philip
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Health Information Management 102
  • Computer Networks and Communications 369
  • Family Practice 32
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 18
  • General Health Professions 350
Replace Hamid GholamHosseini with:
Hamid GholamHosseini New Zealand
Malcolm Clarke United Kingdom
Myra A. Aud United States
Mirza Mansoor Baig New Zealand
Leila Shahmoradi Iran
Vicente Traver Spain
Ole Hejlesen Denmark
Venet Osmani Italy
Plinio Pelegrini Morita Canada
Aleksandra Sarcevic United States
Nada Philip relative to Hamid GholamHosseini New Zealand Hamid GholamHosseini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hamid GholamHosseini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nada Philip

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nada Philip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nada Philip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nada Philip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nada Philip

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nada Philip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nada Philip. The network helps show where Nada Philip may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nada Philip, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nada Philip Line = papers co-authored together Nada Philip links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021161
2 2011140
3 201567
4 201663
5 200956
6 201448
7 201746
8 201444
9 201639
10 202033
11 200832
12 201930
13 201130
14 201828
15 200927
16 201626
17 201126
18 201826
19 201925
20 201223

About Nada Philip

Nada Philip is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (22 papers), Advanced Wireless Network Optimization (15 papers), Image and Video Quality Assessment (11 papers), Wireless Body Area Networks (10 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (10 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (9 papers), IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (8 papers) and Advanced Data Compression Techniques (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (102 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (369 citations), Family Practice (32 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (18 citations) and General Health Professions (350 citations). Nada Philip has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia and Greece. Frequent co-authors include R.S.H. Istepanian, Ala Sungoor, Reem Kayyali, Shereen Nabhani‐Gebara, Sijung Hu, Maria G. Martini, Simon Fong, Jia Chen, Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues and Honggang Wang. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print), BMJ Open and Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact