Hina Andaleeb
- Plant Science
- Food Science top 10%
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Najeeb UllahHaq NawazMuhammad Aslam ShadChristian BetzelSven FalkeMohibullah ShahNaeem Mahmood AshrafH. Brognaro
- Topics
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers)Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (2 papers)Biofuel production and bioconversion (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Partner nations
- PakistanGermanyDemocratic Republic of the Congo
In The Last Decade
Hina Andaleeb
13 papers receiving 285 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Plant Science 127
- Food Science 104
- Biochemistry 83
- Molecular Biology 43
- Complementary and alternative medicine 41
Countries citing papers authored by Hina Andaleeb
This map shows the geographic impact of Hina Andaleeb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hina Andaleeb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hina Andaleeb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hina Andaleeb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hina Andaleeb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hina Andaleeb. The network helps show where Hina Andaleeb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hina Andaleeb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hina Andaleeb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hina Andaleeb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hina Andaleeb. Hina Andaleeb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | Effect of solvent polarity on extraction yield and antioxidant properties of phytochemicals from bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seedsbreakdown → | 255 |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 4 |
About Hina Andaleeb
Hina Andaleeb is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Gastroenterology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (2 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (83 citations), Drug Discovery (2 citations) and Food Science (104 citations). Hina Andaleeb has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, Germany and Democratic Republic of the Congo. Frequent co-authors include Najeeb Ullah, Haq Nawaz, Muhammad Aslam Shad, Christian Betzel, Sven Falke, Mohibullah Shah, Naeem Mahmood Ashraf, H. Brognaro, Adnan Amjad and Carsten Wrenger. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.