Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use
This map shows the geographic impact of Henri Barki's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henri Barki with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henri Barki more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henri Barki. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henri Barki. The network helps show where Henri Barki may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Henri Barki
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Henri Barki.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Henri Barki based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Henri Barki. Henri Barki is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Barki, Henri, et al.. (2019). Affordance Networks: An Approach for Linking IT features-in-use to Their Effects. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
Barki, Henri, et al.. (2016). A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE ON IT AFFORDANCES. European Conference on Information Systems.
7.
Barki, Henri, et al.. (2016). Coping with Information Privacy Breaches: An Exploratory Framework. International Conference on Information Systems.1 indexed citations
Barki, Henri, et al.. (2014). Individuals' IT-related Privacy Concerns: a Two-phase Cognitive Model.. International Conference on Information Systems.1 indexed citations
10.
Barki, Henri, et al.. (2014). "Like" is More than Just a Thumbs up: The Role of Feedback and Sociability in SNS Usage. Americas Conference on Information Systems.6 indexed citations
11.
Barki, Henri, et al.. (2013). Functional Affordance Archetypes: a New Perspective for Examining the Impact of IT Use on Desirable Outcomes. International Conference on Information Systems.10 indexed citations
Barki, Henri, et al.. (2013). Conceptualizing unexpected events in IT projects. International Conference on Information Systems.2 indexed citations
14.
Barki, Henri, et al.. (2012). The Relationship between Habit and Intention in Post- adoptive IS Acceptance. Americas Conference on Information Systems.2 indexed citations
Barki, Henri, Suzanne Rivard, & Jean‐Noël Talbot. (1997). Risk Management by Information Systems Project Leaders.. European Conference on Information Systems. 254–265.3 indexed citations
19.
Barki, Henri & Izak Benbasat. (1996). Contributions of the Theory of Reasoned Action to the Study of Information Systems: Foundations, Empirical Research and Extensions.. European Conference on Information Systems. 5–16.3 indexed citations
20.
Barki, Henri, Suzanne Rivard, & Jean‐Noël Talbot. (1993). Toward an Assessment of Software Development Risk. Journal of Management Information Systems. 10(2). 203–225.534 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.