Helen Taft Manning
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 5
- Political Systems and Governance 3
- Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism 2
-
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade 2
-
- Canadian Identity and History 5
- Australian History and Society 4
- History top 10%
- Law top 10%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 2
-
- American History and Culture 2
- Co-authors
- Paul KnaplundJ. A. La NauzeA. R. Μ. LowerJ. D. B. MillerR. M. CookDavid B. HinshawA. P. ThorntonJohn S. Galbraith
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (14 papers)Political Science Quarterly (1 paper)Journal of British Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Helen Taft Manning
22 papers receiving 118 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Political Science and International Relations 60
- Anthropology 23
- Sociology and Political Science 105
- History 19
- Law 12
Countries citing papers authored by Helen Taft Manning
This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Taft Manning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Taft Manning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Taft Manning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Taft Manning
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Taft Manning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Taft Manning. The network helps show where Helen Taft Manning may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Helen Taft Manning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 2 | Analysis of household retrofit expenditures | 1983 | 2 |
| 3 | 1974 | 21 | |
| 4 | 1973 | 17 | |
| 5 | 1972 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1969 | 17 | |
| 7 | The Union of the Canadas: The Growth of Canadian Institutions, 1841–1857 by J. M. S. Careless (review) | 1968 | 1 |
| 8 | 1967 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1966 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1966 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1965 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1962 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1961 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1961 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1960 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1959 | 15 | |
| 17 | 1953 | 30 | |
| 18 | 1952 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1952 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1951 | 4 |
About Helen Taft Manning
Helen Taft Manning is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and Marketing, having authored 24 papers that have together received 179 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Canadian Identity and History (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers), Australian History and Society (4 papers), Political Systems and Governance (3 papers), Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (2 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), American History and Culture (2 papers) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (60 citations), Anthropology (23 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (105 citations). Helen Taft Manning has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Knaplund, J. A. La Nauze, A. R. Μ. Lower, J. D. B. Miller, R. M. Cook, David B. Hinshaw, A. P. Thornton, John S. Galbraith, R. Goeltz and Robin W. Winks. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Political Science Quarterly and Journal of British Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.