Edward Feit

426 citations
18 papers · 203 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Edward Feit

15 papers receiving 129 citations

Peers

Edward Feit
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Anthropology 40
  • Sociology and Political Science 150
  • Law 32
  • Development 11
  • Archeology 3
Replace Prosser Gifford with:
Prosser Gifford
Kenneth Ingham United Kingdom
Robert Heussler
Charles H. Heimsath United States
George H. Sabine United States
Wolfgang Reinhard Germany
Margery Perham United States
Steven Forde United States
Jacques Louis Hymans United States
Emma Lou Thornbrough United States
Edward Feit relative to Prosser Gifford Prosser Gifford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Prosser Gifford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward Feit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Feit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Feit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Feit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Feit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Feit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Feit. The network helps show where Edward Feit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Edward Feit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward Feit Line = papers co-authored together Edward Feit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 197897
2 196832
3
The armed bureaucrats;: Military-administrative regimes and political development
197217
4 197311
5 19728
6 19756
7 19696
8 19735
9 19705
10
South Africa : the dynamics of the African National Congress
19624
11 19693
12 19672
13 19722
14 19762
15
Governments and leaders : an approach to comparative politics
19781
16 19941
17 19701
18 19770

About Edward Feit

Edward Feit is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Law and Religious studies, having authored 18 papers that have together received 203 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South African History and Culture (7 papers), African history and culture studies (4 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (1 paper), Hispanic-African Historical Relations (1 paper), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper), Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper), Legal Issues in South Africa (1 paper) and African studies and sociopolitical issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (40 citations), Sociology and Political Science (150 citations), Law (32 citations), Development (11 citations) and Archeology (3 citations). Edward Feit has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Karis, Gwendolen M. Carter, Gail M. Gerhart, T. E. Karis and Sheridan Johns. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of African Historical Studies, World Politics, Comparative Politics, The Journal of Modern African Studies and International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact