Geoffrey MacCormack

401 total citations
31 papers, 124 citations indexed

About

Geoffrey MacCormack is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Law and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Geoffrey MacCormack has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 124 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Law and 6 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Geoffrey MacCormack's work include Chinese history and philosophy (11 papers), Law in Society and Culture (6 papers) and Legal principles and applications (6 papers). Geoffrey MacCormack is often cited by papers focused on Chinese history and philosophy (11 papers), Law in Society and Culture (6 papers) and Legal principles and applications (6 papers). Geoffrey MacCormack collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Geoffrey MacCormack's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Legal History, The American Journal of Comparative Law and Modern Law Review.

In The Last Decade

Geoffrey MacCormack

24 papers receiving 90 citations

Peers

Geoffrey MacCormack
Herbert J. Liebesny United States
Laurent Mayali United States
Hans L. Trefousse United States
Farhat J. Zıadeh United States
Benjamin C. Sax United States
Reginald E. Zelnik United States
Catherine Evtuhov United States
Ming K. Chan United States
Herbert J. Liebesny United States
Geoffrey MacCormack
Citations per year, relative to Geoffrey MacCormack Geoffrey MacCormack (= 1×) peers Herbert J. Liebesny

Countries citing papers authored by Geoffrey MacCormack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geoffrey MacCormack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoffrey MacCormack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoffrey MacCormack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geoffrey MacCormack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoffrey MacCormack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoffrey MacCormack. The network helps show where Geoffrey MacCormack may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (2015). Lau, Ulrich/Lüdke, Michael: Exemplarische Rechtsfälle vom Beginn der Han-Dynastie – Eine kommentierte Übersetzung des Zouyanshu aus Zhangjiashan/Provinz Hubei. Asiatische Studien – Études Asiatiques. 69(2). 511–518. 2 indexed citations
2.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (2010). Issues of causation in homicide decisions of the Qing Board of Punishments from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 73(2). 285–310. 1 indexed citations
3.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (2006). Filial Piety (Xiao) and the Family in Pre-"Tang" Law. 55–83. 2 indexed citations
4.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (2006). The Legalist School and its Influence upon Traditional Chinese Law. 92(1). 59–81.
5.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (2002). Hsiang Hsing and Hua Hsiang: the problem of "symbolic" punishments in early China. 297–324. 1 indexed citations
6.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (2002). Filial piety and the pre-T'ang law. 2002(8). 137–164. 1 indexed citations
7.
MacCormack, Geoffrey, et al.. (1997). The Spirit of Traditional Chinese Law. American Journal of Legal History. 41(1). 158–158. 5 indexed citations
8.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (1995). Was the Ordeal Known in Ancient China. 71–96. 1 indexed citations
9.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (1993). "Dolus" in Decisions of the Mid-classical Jurists (Iulian-Marcellus). 83–146.
10.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (1986). The Lü Hsing: Problems of Legal Interpretation. Monumenta Serica. 37(1). 35–47. 1 indexed citations
11.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (1983). Ope Consilio Furtum Factum. Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review. 51(3). 271–293.
12.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (1979). VII. Periculum. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte Romanistische Abteilung. 96(1). 129–172.
13.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (1979). “LAW” AND “LEGAL SYSTEM”. Modern Law Review. 42(3). 285–290. 1 indexed citations
14.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (1978). Anthropology and Legal Theory. 216–232. 2 indexed citations
15.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (1977). Grotius and Stair on Promises. The American Journal of Jurisprudence. 22(1). 160–167. 2 indexed citations
16.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (1974). Iusta and Iniusta Possessio. Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review. 42(1). 71–80. 1 indexed citations
17.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (1973). Witnesses in the law of the twelve tables. 225–243.
18.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (1972). Nemo sibi ipse causam possessionis mutare potest. 71–96. 1 indexed citations
19.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (1971). Roman and African Litigation. Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review. 39(2). 221–255. 1 indexed citations
20.
MacCormack, Geoffrey. (1969). Formalism, Symbolism and Magic in Early Roman Law. Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review. 37(3). 439–468. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026