Heather Mitchell

633 total citations
28 papers, 448 citations indexed

About

Heather Mitchell is a scholar working on Oncology, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Heather Mitchell has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 448 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Oncology, 8 papers in Epidemiology and 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Heather Mitchell's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (11 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (8 papers) and Cancer Risks and Factors (4 papers). Heather Mitchell is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (11 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (8 papers) and Cancer Risks and Factors (4 papers). Heather Mitchell collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Heather Mitchell's co-authors include Gabriele Medley, Graham G. Giles, Anne Kavanagh, Jennifer Cawson, Singer A, Michael J. Campion, Diane Orr Chlebowy, Dan O. Popa, M. Cynthia Logsdon and Sumit Kumar Das and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Medical Internet Research and The Medical Journal of Australia.

In The Last Decade

Heather Mitchell

28 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Heather Mitchell Australia 11 198 163 74 55 52 28 448
Patrice Heid France 9 164 0.8× 185 1.1× 44 0.6× 13 0.2× 30 0.6× 20 294
Richard Zubarik United States 12 308 1.6× 80 0.5× 20 0.3× 25 0.5× 26 0.5× 27 637
Colleen M. Vrbin United States 14 96 0.5× 94 0.6× 44 0.6× 17 0.3× 16 0.3× 23 481
Eyal Fisher Israel 8 49 0.2× 37 0.2× 44 0.6× 21 0.4× 80 1.5× 14 345
Aleksandar Vodovnik Norway 8 70 0.4× 49 0.3× 83 1.1× 9 0.2× 24 0.5× 20 270
Cheng-Shyong Chang Taiwan 11 118 0.6× 198 1.2× 14 0.2× 13 0.2× 48 0.9× 16 515
Jaideep Chakladar United States 12 111 0.6× 60 0.4× 58 0.8× 11 0.2× 26 0.5× 23 505
Paul J. J. M. Klinkhamer Netherlands 12 321 1.6× 688 4.2× 53 0.7× 12 0.2× 59 1.1× 14 854
Mariam Hassan United States 7 103 0.5× 47 0.3× 75 1.0× 34 0.6× 29 0.6× 30 317

Countries citing papers authored by Heather Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Mitchell. The network helps show where Heather Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heather Mitchell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heather Mitchell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heather Mitchell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heather Mitchell. Heather Mitchell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Logsdon, M. Cynthia, et al.. (2024). Perceived Usefulness of Robotic Technology for Patient Fall Prevention. Workplace Health & Safety. 72(12). 542–549. 4 indexed citations
2.
Tran, Thuy, et al.. (2023). Real-world Experience of Caplacizumab for Adolescents in the First-line Setting: Case Reports. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology. 45(8). e1031–e1034. 2 indexed citations
3.
Logsdon, M. Cynthia, et al.. (2022). Robots as Patient Sitters. CIN Computers Informatics Nursing. 40(9). 581–586. 1 indexed citations
4.
Saadatzi, Mohammad Nasser, M. Cynthia Logsdon, Sumit Kumar Das, et al.. (2020). Acceptability of Using a Robotic Nursing Assistant in Health Care Environments: Experimental Pilot Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(11). e17509–e17509. 25 indexed citations
5.
Mitchell, Heather, S. Faisal Ahmed, Assunta Albanese, et al.. (2020). Peer Review of Paediatric Endocrine Services in the UK: A Template for Quality and Service Improvement. Hormone Research in Paediatrics. 93(11-12). 616–621. 1 indexed citations
6.
Mitchell, Heather, Jane S. Hocking, & Marion Saville. (2006). Temporal Characteristics of Laboratory Screening Errors in Cervical Cytology. Acta Cytologica. 50(5). 492–498. 8 indexed citations
7.
Mitchell, Heather. (2006). The price of guidelines: revising the national guidelines for managing Australian women with abnormal Pap smears. Sexual Health. 3(1). 53–53. 1 indexed citations
8.
Kavanagh, Anne, Heather Mitchell, & Graham G. Giles. (2000). Hormone replacement therapy and accuracy of mammographic screening. The Lancet. 355(9200). 270–274. 122 indexed citations
9.
Kavanagh, Anne, Graham G. Giles, Heather Mitchell, & Jennifer Cawson. (2000). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of screening mammography and symptomatic status. Journal of Medical Screening. 7(2). 105–110. 44 indexed citations
10.
Mitchell, Heather & Gabriele Medley. (1998). Detection of Laboratory False Negative Smears by the PAPNET Cytologic Screening System. Acta Cytologica. 42(1). 265–270. 13 indexed citations
11.
Mitchell, Heather & Gabriele Medley. (1998). Detection of Unsuspected Abnormalities by PAPNET-Assisted Review. Acta Cytologica. 42(1). 260–264. 6 indexed citations
12.
Frable, William J., et al.. (1998). Medicolegal Affairs. Acta Cytologica. 42(1). 76–132. 22 indexed citations
13.
Mitchell, Heather, et al.. (1996). An Audit of the Women Who Died During 1994 from Cancer of the Cervix in Victoria, Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 36(1). 73–76. 3 indexed citations
14.
Mitchell, Heather & Gabriele Medley. (1995). Differences between papanicolaou smears with correct and incorrect diagnoses. Cytopathology. 6(6). 368–375. 84 indexed citations
15.
Mitchell, Heather & Les Irwig. (1991). 8. Screening as a strategy for disease control. The Medical Journal of Australia. 155(4). 237–242. 2 indexed citations
16.
Mitchell, Heather, et al.. (1990). AN EVALUATION OF A CAMPAIGN TO INCREASE CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING IN RURAL VICTORIA. Community Health Studies. 14(3). 263–268. 15 indexed citations
17.
Mitchell, Heather. (1990). REMINDER LETTERS FOR WOMEN WHEN REPEAT PAP SMEARS ARE DUE. Community Health Studies. 14(2). 126–131. 12 indexed citations
18.
Mitchell, Heather & Gabriele Medley. (1989). Evidence Against Diathermy as a Beneficial Treatment for Human Papillomavirus Infection of the Cervix. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 29(4). 439–442. 2 indexed citations
19.
Mitchell, Heather & Gabriele Medley. (1988). Pap Smear Results of Victorian Teenagers, 1980–1987. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 28(3). 213–215. 4 indexed citations
20.
Campion, Michael J., Singer A, & Heather Mitchell. (1987). Complacency in diagnosis of cervical cancer.. BMJ. 294(6583). 1337–1339. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026